 |
||||
|
Sponsor: Ville de Versailles Type: EU, invited Location: place Lyautey à Versailles, France Process: EOI, shortlist with four (4) finalists Language: French Timetable: 18 September 2020 – Deadline for applications Project: Versailles tourism administration centre Contact: marches.publics@versailles.fr
Sponsor: FDI Habitat Type: EU, invited Location: Montpelier, France Process: EOI, shortlist with three (3) finalists Language: French Timetable: 1 September 2020 – Deadline for applications Project: 56 assisted living housing units For more information: fdi-habitat.achatpublic.com
Sponsor: GIE GRAND PARIS HABITAT Type: EU, invited Location: Paris, France Process: EOI, shortlist with three (3) finalists Language: French Timetable: 2 September 2020 – Deadline for applications Project: 60 intergenerational affordable housing units For more information: www.achatpublic.com Organizer: The American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) Eligibility: U.S.-based architects who are either currently seeking licensure or have been licensed for fewer than 10 years Deadline: November 1, 2020 Fee: Free to enter Prize: $15,000 Jury: • Pascale Sablan, AIA, Senior Associate at S9ARCHITECTURE • Bob Type: open, international, two-stage Process: Stage 2 will consist of seven teams shortlisted from stage 1 Location: Seoul, Korea. Languages: English, Korean Eligibility: Architects, planners, etc. Timetable: 14 August 2020 – Registration deadline Scope of project: Main use: Facilities for cultural activities and assembly Scale: The gross floor area
Type: open, international, anonymous, two-stage Location: Seoul, Korea. Languages: English, Korean Eligibility: Architects, planners, etc. Timetable: 21 August 2020 – Registration deadline Scope of project: Main use: Facilities for cultural activities and assembly Scope of project: The spatial scope corresponding to a draft plan of 5,500㎡ as presented in the
Sponsor: SIA “DG31” Type: Open, International, one-stage Location: Riga, Latvia Process: EOI, shortlist with three (3) finalists Languages: Latvian and English Fees: none, but participants must register to receive the documents Timetable: 12 October 2020 – Deadline for submissions Jury: (see competition brief) Awards: • 1st Type: open, RfQ, two-stage Location: Czech Republic Languages: Czech, English Eligibility: Registered architects/landscape architects Process: The jury will shortlist six teams from the first, RfQ round to participate in the second round of the competition The Jury will evaluate the submitted portfolios based on the degree of fulfillment of the following criteria: a) total Sponsor: British Network Rail Type: open, international, anonymous Location: U.K. Languages: English Eligibility: Architects, planners, etc. Timetable: 4 August 2020 – End of Q&A period 11 September 2020 – Last date for registration 15 September 2020 – Submission deadline (Phase one) Judging Panel: Lucy Musgrave OBE (founding director of Publica) Jonathan McDowell (director, Matter Architecture)
Sponsor: Seoul Metropolitan Government Jongno-gu Location: Seoul, South Korea Type: Open, international Language: Korean, English Fee: None Eligibility: Both Korean and foreign licensed architects can participate, and one team can be made of up to three architects but one appointed representative should carry out the registration. Timetable: 20 August 2020 – Registration deadline 27 |
Young Architects in CompetitionsWhen Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset?
This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions.
Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link: Reimagining Brooklyn Bridge: The Reinvention of a 19th Century Icon
While looking for new adventures on a visit to New York City, friends suggested that I take time to walk across the Brooklyn Bridge—certainly a New York icon. For those intending to undertake this trek across the bridge for the first time, the bridge consists of layers, with a large platform for pedestrians on top of a lower level for cars and the metro system. Traversing this connection for the first time between Manhattan and Brooklyn is not just about getting from one place to another, but experiencing a great scenic view of both boroughs and occasionally interacting with other bridge crossers. As for the latter, they provide a flavor of the city’s demographics, as opposed to similar experiences one might have of the city’s inhabitants when riding the city’s subway system. Another Competition for Moscow’s Expanding Subway Network
Even under Stalin, Moscow subway stations represented the crown jewels of the city’s projects when it came to design. In more recent years, the emphasis placed on modern design in the city’s expanding metro rail network has resulted in some major new projects, and this year’s competitions for two stations was no exception: the Klenoviy Boulevard Station 2 won by Zaha Hadid Architects (London), and the Prospect Marshala Zhukova station, won by the ASADOV Architectural Bureau (Moscow). A Modern Upgrade for an Industrial Urban SectorHangang District Urban Design International Master Competition
1st place entry by Dominique Perrault Architecture (image ©Dominique Perrault Architect)
China’s planning priorities for their urban areas experienced a sharp turn after the post-Mao reforms took place. During the early post-WWII period, when Soviet influence in the early urbanization of China dominated, industrial development took precedence over all other issues, with heritage, conservation, residential planning, and the amenities associated with it, being almost entirely neglected.
Powerhouse Precinct at Parramatta
 Winning design by ©Moreau Kusunoki /Genton
Although one might normally assume that local firms participating in a competition might have a clear advantage over foreign competitors, this has seldom been the case: just see Sydney’s Opera House, won by a Danish architect, and Toronto’s City Hall, won by a Finn—as evidence that well devised competition briefs as adequate documentation can create a level playing field for potential competitors, regardless of their location.
Architecture at Zero
Beginning in 2011, Architecture at Zero, a collaboration between the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) and the California chapter of the American Institute of Architects (AIACA), was established to investigate the role architecture might play in reducing energy consumption in the built environment. Since then, every year has seen a new site and building type selected as a design challenge in what has become one of the world’s most interesting international competitions. As a sign of its mounting popularity, the competition received 237 registrations from 49 countries and, according to the professional adviser, about 150 entries— all this during the Covid-19 virus pandemic, when all were compelled to work from home.
|
|||
|
Copyright © 2020 Competitions All Rights Reserved Competitions-Archive LLC, Ph: (502) 451-3623; Fax: (502) 451-3623 Website: https://competitions.org E: scollyer@competitions.org Privacy Policy: CP-Privacy-Policy.pdf IMPORTANT NOTICE : Unless otherwise indicated, photographs of buildings and projects are from professional or institutional archives. All reproduction is prohibited unless authorized by the architects, designers, office managers, consortia or archives centers concerned. The Competitions-Archive LLC is not held responsible for any omissions or inaccuracies, but appreciate all comments and pertinent information that will permit necessary modifications during future updates. Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
||||
