Entries are now on view at the competition website:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/nvr76jy07cpe6wp/AACJEH3xV5WZIqcVX-F_R6aka?dl=0
Final adjudication of the rankings will occur in late April.
 |
||||
|
The first phase of the Competition attracted entries from competitors based in Australia; France; Germany; India; Iran; Italy; the Netherlands; Poland; Thailand; the United Kingdom and the United States of America Following appraisal of the anonymous design submissions, the authors of the four short listed EcoResponsive Environments Ltd., Leicester, U.K. CF MØller Architects
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania Type: Open, international Number of entries: 177 Process: As a result of the open competition, three finalists were chosen to refine their designs and submit them for final evaluation by the municipality of Kaunas.
The three finalists were:
UAB Paleko Archstudija and UAB Baltic Engineers (Lithuania) Feilden Clegg Login to see more (login problems? E: scollyer@competitions.org or http://competitions.org/contact/)
First Prize: Kleihues + Kleihues Gesellschaft von Architekten mbH, Berlin/Germany
Second Prize: Burø architects, Kyiv/Ukraine
Third Prize: Lina Ghotmeh – Architecture, Paris/France
Runner-up: Dominique Lyon Architectes, Paris/France
Runner-up: Coop Himme(l)blau, Vienna/Austria
Runner-up: Guillermo Vázquez Consuegra Arquitecto SLP, Seville/Spain
Winning entry ©studio McLeod Location: Kent, U.K. Competition administration: RIBA
Winner Studio McLeod and Ekkist, London Finalists ArkleBoyce Architects, U.K. Ben Adams Architectsm U.K. Bilska de Beaupuy.
Note: Sevenoaks Wildlife Reserve comprises 73 hectares of mixed habitat almost entirely man-made. The five lakes, ponds, reedbeds and woodland are home to an
Image: ©Kevin Daly Architects
Type: From 100 design professionals from around the world which were invited to submit qualifications, 25 were selected and invited to participate in the competition. Sponsor/Facilitator: Faye Jones School of Architecture and Design, Fayetteville, Arkansas Support was furnished by the Walton Family Foundation
The competition winners were:
The designs of the six shortlisted teams that entered the Adelaide Contemporary competition are now on display.
Adjaye Associates and BVN with McGregor Coxall, Steensen Varming, Plan A Consultants, Barbara Flynn, Yvonne Koolmatrie, Aurecon Group and Front Inc
BIG – Bjarke Ingels Group and JPE Design Studio with United
It’s almost strange to state that the format of the above competition is a departure from the recent trend toward invited competitions in Taiwan. But competition adviser Barry Cheng administered an open, two-stage international competition, which recently ended with the top two places going to well-known U.S.-based firms: Morphosis (Los Angeles) and Leers
The shortlist was expanded from the expected five to six in recognition of the outstanding response from the international design community. The finalist teams won their places on the basis of submissions scored on relevant experience and team composition. Diller Scofidio + Renfro (US) John Ronan Architects (US) O’Donnell + Tuomey (Ireland) Steven Holl |
Rise in the City: An Affordable Housing Competition in Lesotho
The Rise in the City Housing Competition in the African country of Lesotho presented many similarities with student competitions that have occurred over the past decades, the main link being the presence of mentors as advisers to the team(s) who were designing the entries. One of the most famous examples of this was the winning design for the Vietnam Memorial Competition by Maya Lin, who was enrolled at the time in a studio course at Yale University. In that case it was also a case of students competing against professionals. Lin’s design just happened to find favor with the jury.
OFFICE 52 at Carnegie Mellon
Form and Dichroic Light
In his introduction to Form and Dichroic LIght, Michael Crosbie never mentions the term, “wild card,” to describe Office 52’s participation in the invited competition for the Carnegie Mellon Engineering Building. The four finalists, picked from a list of 17 firms, also included three household names: ZGF, Wilson, and BCJ (Bohlin Cywinski, Jackson). So what possible chance could a firm, which had just recently opened a small office in Portland, Oregon, have against a competition lineup of this magnitude? But as OFFICE 52 Principal, Isaac Campbell explained, as a small firm, “we were quite nimble,” and the $50,000 stipend the firms all received to produce a design could allow OFFICE 52 more time to undertake the research involved than might be the case with a larger office, where a cost controller is constantly focusing on the operation.
SMÍCHOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: |
|||
|
Copyright © 2019 Competitions All Rights Reserved COMPETITIONS, P.O. Box 20445, Louisville, Ky 40250 U.S.A Ph: (502) 451-3623; Fax: (502) 451-3623 Website: https://competitions.org E: scollyer@competitions.org Privacy Policy: CP-Privacy-Policy.pdf IMPORTANT NOTICE : Unless otherwise indicated, photographs of buildings and projects are from professional or institutional archives. All reproduction is prohibited unless authorized by the architects, designers, office managers, consortia or archives centers concerned. The Competition Project, Inc. is not held responsible for any omissions or inaccuracies, but appreciate all comments and pertinent information that will permit necessary modifications during future updates. Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
||||
