North Boulder Creative Campus Overview
The North Boulder Creative Campus brings together two distinct projects to create an artistic hub for the community: (1) an iconic facility for BMoCA, which will be the cultural anchor of the campus; (2) the broader cultural campus including housing options for diverse needs; live work spaces supporting a range of creative practices; and commercial and retail spaces. These elements will harmoniously commingle, support each other and thrive in a campus that is net zero to the environment.
Sponsors: Emerald Management and Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA)
Facilitor: Trestle Strategy Group
Type: RFQ, open
Fee: none
Eligibility: Qualified design teams
(Design teams are invited to submit their qualifications, including portfolios demonstrating relevant experience, conceptual approaches to similar projects, and an outline of their proposed team structure.)
Language: English
Anticipated budget: $13.5M
Timetable:
15 March 2024 – RfQ deadline
Process:
Shortlisted teams will be required to attend in-person presentations and interviews in Boulder, Colorado, as well as participate in an in-person public open house. hortlisted teams will be required to attend in-person presentations and interviews in Boulder, Colorado, as well as participate in an in-person public open house.
Design Challenge:
This RFQ is seeking innovative and visionary design teams to develop a 100,000-square-foot campus that integrates creative, residential, and commercial spaces. BMoCA, a key cultural institution in Boulder for over fifty years, will be the centerpiece of this project, which aims to enhance community engagement and artistic expression in a sustainable and inclusive environment.
Emerald Management and BMoCA seek to enhance North Boulder through the Creative Campus project, providing sustainable contributions to the NoBo Art District’s burgeoning reputation as an arts and culture hub by creating a development that provides long-term value to the community. Our assessment seeks to support this vision through research, focused engagement, strategic community engagement, and balanced qualitative and quantitative data which can be used in decision making and development. Emerald Management and BMoCA’s goals for this work are:
● To ensure that whatever is ultimately developed is inclusive of the current NoBo community (landowners, tenants, residents, artists) and identify ways for locals to inhabit the new spaces to be developed (i.e. development without displacement);
● To address concerns about inclusiveness and gentrification in an intentional and thoughtful way; and
● To bring the community on board in a manner that allows them to help shape the development in ways that support their values and sustainability
The community engagement and survey work focused on identifying the values of the NoBo community. The perspective is two fold:
a) people protect what’s important to them; and
b) shared values are a form of currency and have a defined worth in a community.
The community overwhelmingly prioritized the following as their values in the survey:
1. The protection of natural resources and the environment as you develop is important;
2. Artistic discovery, creation and exchange must be given space; and
3. The development of built infrastructure that supports accessibility, affordability, and flexibility should be the priority. There was additional context established as to how these values are implemented, specifically:
● This project is an opportunity to live the values we promote, breaking out of similar typologies and approaches to development and programming.
● The Creative Campus should explore how to diversify the economic base of the community and confirm opportunities to allow individuals to both design and own space.
● Create intentional paths to ethnic and social diversity and economic exchange through the design of spaces and programming, recognizing art can be a tool for inclusion.
● Sustain the region’s natural resources, being very intentional about design, environmental stewardship and sustainability.
For more information, go to:
Website: https://www.trestlestrategy.com/nobo-creative-campus
For questions: marine@trestlestrategy.com
|
Helsinki Central Library, by ALA Architects (2012-2018)
The world has experienced a limited number of open competitions over the past three decades, but even with diminishing numbers, some stand out among projects in their categories that can’t be ignored for the high quality and degree of creativity they revealed. Included among those are several invited competitions that were extraordinary in their efforts to explore new avenues of institutional and museum design. Some might ask why the Vietnam Memorial is not mentioned here. Only included in our list are competitions that were covered by us, beginning in 1990 with COMPETITIONS magazine to the present day. As for what category a project under construction (Science Island), might belong to or fundraising still in progress (San Jose’s Urban Confluence or the Cold War Memorial competition, Wisconsin), we would classify the former as “built” and wait and see what happens with the latter—keeping our fingers crossed for a positive outcome.
Read More…
Young Architects in Competitions
When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset?
This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions.
Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link:
https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/
RUR model perspective – ©RUR
New Kaohsiung Port and Cruise Terminal, Taiwan (2011-2020)
Reiser+Umemoto RUR Architecture PC/ Jesse Reiser – U.S.A.
with
Fei & Cheng Associates/Philip T.C. Fei –R.O.C. (Tendener)
This was probably the last international open competition result that was built in Taiwan. A later competition for the Keelung Harbor Service Building Competition, won by Neil Denari of the U.S., the result of a shortlisting procedure, was not built. The fact that the project by RUR was eventually completed—the result of the RUR/Fei & Cheng’s winning entry there—certainly goes back to the collaborative role of those to firms in winning the 2008 Taipei Pop Music Center competition, a collaboration that should not be underestimated in setting the stage for this competition.
Read more…
Winning entry ©Herzog de Meuron
In visiting any museum, one might wonder what important works of art are out of view in storage, possibly not considered high profile enough to see the light of day? In Korea, an answer to this question is in the making.
It can come as no surprise that museums are running out of storage space. This is not just the case with long established “western” museums, but elsewhere throughout the world as well. In Seoul, South Korea, such an issue has been addressed by planning for a new kind of storage facility, the Seouipul Open Storage Museum. The new institution will house artworks and artifacts of three major museums in Seoul: the Seoul Museum of Modern Art, the Seoul Museum of History, and the Seoul Museum of Craft Art.
Read more…
Belfast Looks Toward an Equitable and Sustainable Housing Model
Birdseye view of Mackie site ©Matthew Lloyd Architects
If one were to look for a theme that is common to most affordable housing models, public access has been based primarily on income, or to be more precise, the very lack of it. Here it is no different, with Belfast’s homeless problem posing a major concern. But the competition also hopes to address another of Belfast’s decades-long issues—its religious divide. There is an underlying assumption here that religion will play no part in a selection process. The competition’s local sponsor was “Take Back the City,” its membership consisting mainly of social advocates. In setting priorities for the housing model, the group interviewed potential future dwellers as well as stakeholders to determine the nature of this model. Among those actions taken was the “photo- mapping of available land in Belfast, which could be used to tackle the housing crisis. Since 2020, (the group) hosted seminars that brought together international experts and homeless people with the goal of finding solutions. Surveys and workshops involving local people, housing associations and council duty-bearers have explored the potential of the Mackie’s site.” This research was the basis for the competition launched in 2022.
Read more…
Alster Swimming Pool after restoration (2023)
Linking Two Competitions with Three Modernist Projects
Hardly a week goes by without the news of another architectural icon being threatened with demolition. A modernist swimming pool in Hamburg, Germany belonged in this category, even though the concrete shell roof had been placed under landmark status. When the possibility of being replaced by a high-rise building, it came to the notice of architects at von Gerkan Marg Partners (gmp), who in collaboration with schlaich bergermann partner (sbp), developed a feasibility study that became the basis for the decision to retain and refurbish the building.
Read more…
|
