Client: University of Illinois Location: Chicago Number of applications: 36 Participating shortlisted teams (3): • Foster + Partners with Epstein • Jacobs Consultants, Inc., with OMA*AMO Architecture, P.C. • Studio Gang Architects
|
||||
Client: University of Illinois Location: Chicago Number of applications: 36 Participating shortlisted teams (3): • Foster + Partners with Epstein • Jacobs Consultants, Inc., with OMA*AMO Architecture, P.C. • Studio Gang Architects
The Urban Confluence competition attracted 963 entries from 72 countries and 6 continents. The Community Competition Panel (CCP), comprised of 34 local community leaders including artists, architects, environmentalists, and business leaders, convened for two days of deliberation sessions on July 18 and 19. They diligently reviewed and evaluated all 963 qualified submissions as a
Sponsor’s Statement (Van Alen Institute) Reimagining Brooklyn Bridge, our design competition presented in collaboration with the New York City Council, challenges participants to rethink the iconic Brooklyn Bridge walkway. As made even more clear by the pandemic, the design of our streets and shared spaces must be responsive to the present moment and work
Sponsor: University of California, Berkeley Type: International, Essay – Travel and Fellowship competitions Number of entries: 79 Topic: How do Civic Buildings Create Community? Awards: • For the eight Finalists, there is the “best of the best” First, Second and Third Prizes, and five Honorable Mentions totaling 35,000USD. • In addition, and in lieu When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020 271 illustrations in color and black & white Available in PDF and eBook formats ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the
Type: Open, RfQ, two-stage Location: Sydney, Australia Number of RfQ submissions: 74 teams entered Winner: Moreau Kusunoki (Paris) and Genton(Sydney)
Finalists: • AL_A (UK) and Architectus (Australia) • Bernardes Architecture(Brazil) and Scale Architecture (Australia) • BVN Architecture(Australia) and Carlo Ratti Associati (Italy) • CHROFI (Australia) withReko Rennie (Australia) • Steven
The open two-stage competition welcomed both national and international integrated design teams, with competitors encouraged to demonstrate exceptional design talent, creative flair, sensitivity to the heritage context and expertise in sustainability. Seventy-six teams from 19 countries comprising 241 firms entered the competition’s first stage.
The shortlisted teams are (in alphabetical order):
•
Type: open, RfQ, international Number of Expressions of interest: 121 Shortlisted teams: 4 Compensation: $50,000 for each finalist Competition adviser: Malcolm Reading Consultants Winner Kevin Daly Architects, Los Angeles Honorable Mention Olson Kundig, Seattle Finalists Deborah Berke Partners, New York Schaum/Shieh Architects, Houston/New York
Type: Open, International, RfQ Number of Expressions of Interest: 68 Shortlisted for second stage: 6 Professional adviser: Dovetail Design Strategists Winner Coldefy & Associés with RDAI, Xavier Veilhan, dUCKS scéno, Agence TER, Prof. Laila Farah Finalists Diller Scofidio + Renfro and Rene Gonzalez Architects with Raymond Jungles, Inc. heneghan peng architects, Gustafson Porter +
Location: Kiev, Ukraine Competition Organizer: Phase eins, Berlin Number of entries: 165 Type, Open, international Winner Querkraft Architekten with Kieran Fraser Landscape Design Vienna, Austria 2nd Prize Dorte Mandrup A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark with Martha Schwartz Partners, New York 3rd Prize merz merz gmbh & co. kg, Berlin, Germany with Topotek 1 Gesellschaft von Landschaftsarchitekten |
||||
Copyright © 2023 Competitions All Rights Reserved Competitions-Archive LLC, Ph: (502) 451-3623; Fax: (502) 451-3623 Website: https://competitions.org E: scollyer@competitions.org Privacy Policy: CP-Privacy-Policy.pdf IMPORTANT NOTICE : Unless otherwise indicated, photographs of buildings and projects are from professional or institutional archives. All reproduction is prohibited unless authorized by the architects, designers, office managers, consortia or archives centers concerned. The Competitions-Archive LLC is not held responsible for any omissions or inaccuracies, but appreciate all comments and pertinent information that will permit necessary modifications during future updates. Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |