New Church in Skanderborg, Denmark Type of Competition: RfQ, EWG
Language: Danish Timetable:
18 January 2021 – Deadline for receipt of projects and applications for participation
Compensation:
A fee of DKK 125,000 (USD20,000 approx.) will be paid excl. VAT to the pre-qualified participants who submit a conditional competition proposal. Challenge:
Proposals must be given for new construction of a new church of gross approx. 1 347 m2 church incl. connecting corridor, chapel, basement and tower. Disposition and layout of the proposal is expected to be based on the wishes described in the competition program incl. the 2 main points of the vision. Højvangen Church, the Church Center and the cemetery and associated landscape must be part of an overall elegant whole in interaction with the surrounding context. There must be openness from the church to the surroundings, but also from the surroundings into the church. – the church must signal kindness and friendliness with a focus on calm, silence and contemplation. We want a church which, based on a theological way of thinking, in its expression and scale invites equality, openness and community. – a church where the congregation can see each other during church actions, and where inclusion is a basic design parameter. The project competition, and subsequent tender with negotiation, is carried out with a view to entering into a total consultant contract with the winner for the design and realization of Højvangen Church. The tender process is thus carried out in 2 phases in addition to the pre-qualification phase, where phase 1 constitutes the actual project competition, while phase 2 consists of a tender with negotiation with the nominated winner. The pre-qualification phase of project competition is carried out digitally using the tender system iBinder. Link to the competition material as well as the place for digital submission of ESPD appears from pkt. I.3)
The following is part of the RfQ:
Cover letter with signature as confirmation that the team agrees to the contract – ESPD for total adviser and possibly companies like this one is based on – Optional reference sheet, uploaded as one complete pdf file – Any financial or financial capacity completed in accordance with Title VI.3) – Any completed supporting declaration Technical and professional capacity in accordance with section VI.3) – Completed consortium declaration.
Any questions in the pre-qualification phase must be uploaded to iBinder. All questions and answers will be published in anonymous form on iBinder. Any questions in the pre-qualification phase must be uploaded before January 7, 2021 at. 12. Email: support@ibinder.dk Contact person: Christine Neergaard-Petersen
E-mail: chnp@cowi.com |
An Ideas Competition in Berlin Seeks Answers 
Winning entry perspective Image: ©AllesWirdGut Architekten
Berlin developer HOWOGE recently staged what was regarded as a “planning Laboratory” competition for a model satellite in northwest Berlin. The brief for this invited competition noted that the urban sprawl, which had accompanied the reunification of Germany(and Berlin) in 1989, was low density in character, occupying wide swaths of suburban areas around the city. With previous high density, and now controversial Berlin projects in mind—the problems with Berlin’s high-density Gropius-Stadt as a warning signal—the sponsor here suggested that lessons learned from past mistakes could be avoided with a high-quality design strategy… Read more… Winner Announced for New Preston Mosque Competition
LUCA POIAN FORMS Image courtesy RIBA
Facilitator: RIBA
Location: Preston, U.K.
Type: International, open
The competition attracted over 200 entries from 40 different countries.
Five finalists were chosen to participate in a second phase:
Winner
• LUCA POIAN FORMS, London, UK
Finalists - BLANKPAGE Architects, Lebanon
- Borough Architects + buchhandler-nelli + elca, Cambridge, UK
- Mcheileh Studio, New York (Highly Commended by the Evaluation Panel)
- TABE SHOURI, New York
RIBA competition website:
www.architecture.com/competitions Young Architects in Competitions When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset? This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions. Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link: https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/ Astrakhan Looks to Raise Its Quality of Life Index
Aerial view of downtown Astrakhan
Planning competitions with a strong landscape component take many forms, including some for plazas and gateways to major town centers, city neighborhood sites with multi-story housing units, university campus plans and finally, comprehensive city plans—the latter either being for new towns, as in China, or strategies for the improvement of existing cities—as was here the case with Astrakhan, a major city on the Volga delta, and the Caspian Sea. Read more…
Image: ©wHY Architecture
Earlier this year, an article in the Architects’ Journal described what almost sounded like a death knell for wHY Architecture’s winning competition design for Edinburgh’s Ross Pavilion site. When the competition took place, some observers may have regarded wHY as a wild card, in the company of such high-profile firms as BIG and David Adjaye,* There can be no question that they understood the site and program better than their rivals, and it would have appeared that innovation had won the day. Their design could have served to rethink the way in which this site, with its replacement of an outdated bandstand by a contemporary structure, would serve as a destination for Scotland’s public—much as has been the case for Frank Gehry’s pavilion in Chicago’s Millennium Park. Read more… SWA/Balsley Wins Paveletskaya Plaza Landscape Competition
Aerial view at night – courtesy SWA/Balsley 5+ Design
Of the nine railway stations in Moscow, Paveletskaya is the largest and one of the last of those that opened around the turn of the century. Compared to other Moscow stations, Paveletskaya, designed by Alexander Krasovsky and opened in 1900, represented a lower-key presence in its sprawling configuration, similar to palaces such as a Sans Souci without the ornamentation. The original site for the recent competition included a small park facing the station, bordered on one side by the Ring Road. Post WWII, the site was bifurcated by a road, thus separating the front entrance of the station from the grassy area facing it. Read more… |
