The New Jongno-gu Government Complex Design Competition
Sponsor: Seoul Metropolitan Government Jongno-gu
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Type: Open, international
Language: Korean, English
Fee: None
Eligibility: Both Korean and foreign licensed architects can participate, and one team can be made of up to three architects but one appointed representative should carry out the registration.
Timetable:
20 August 2020 – Registration deadline
27 August – Submission deadline
Honoraria:
First Prize – Commission to develop design
Second Prize – 80,000,000 KRW (about $66,700 US)
Third Prize – 60,000,000 KRW (about $50,000 US)
Fourth Prize – 40,000,000 KRW (about $33,300 US)
Fifth Prize – 20,000,000 KRW (about $17,000 US)
Jury:
• Kim Dong-Jin – Hongik University / architecture
• Yongmi Kim – GEUMSUNG Architects & Associates
• Junsung, Kim – Graduate school of architecture, Konkuk University / architecture
• Insoo Park – PARKiz
• Hyun Seo – Seoul Nat'l Univ.
• Na-Kyoung Yu – Principal, Place Making Associates Co.
• Kwanseok Lee – Kyung Hee University
• Kiok Lee – PHILLIP Architects
• Chung Kee Lee – University of Seoul
• KIM, Hyundai – Preparatory Jury
Design Challenge:
This competition aims to select a future-oriented and sustainable proposal for the governmental office complex that will accommodate both memory of the past as well as futuristic creativity. It will be constructed on the current Jongno-gu Office site which has many historical and cultural layers in order to enhance working efficiency and to create a public and community space for residents of Jongno-gu.
The site of the Jongno-gu Office is of great historical value. It is presumed to be the home of Jeong Do-jeon, a founding contributor of the Joseon Dynasty. In addition, several historical and cultural resources and historical spaces linked to both the Joseon and modern eras are concentrated and distributed around this area. On the east side of the site are modern middle and high-rise buildings, and beyond that are buildings that maintain the traditional architecture and horizontal form of the Joseon Dynasty.
Site summary:
• Site Area: 8,622.3m²
• Total Floor Area: 66,970m² (Total Floor Area and each program area can be changed within ±3% of required area)
• Estimated construction cost: KRW 168,161 million (approx $140,428,520 US)
• Design Cost: KRW 8,904 million, including VAT and Securities for Damage Liability (approx $7,436,950 US)
Available Materials:
The following materials are provided on official website and only registered entrants can have access: •Design Competition Guidelines (Korean and English)
•[Attachment] Detailed Guideline of Programs (Korean and English) •Forms (design description cover form, relevant documents, etc.)
•Task Instruction (Korean)
•Project Site Digital Map
•Site Survey Drawing (* Surveyed as of 2015, and the surrounding condition may differ slightly)
•Drawings of main building of Jongno-gu Office (plan, elevation, section, and structural plan)
•Safety Inspection Report of main building (Korean)
•Abbreviated report on the first and second drilling investigation of buried cultural properties (Korean)
•Maintenance plan decision
•Breakdown on design service cost
•Report on the actual status of preservation values including signboards and monuments (Korean)
•Drawings of temporary land dividing line
•Link to the project site of the 3D spatial information system in Seoul https://vo.la/X1R8
•Construction Documents for underground public pedestrian passage connected to Gwanghwamun Station related to Urban Environment Improvement Project in Cheongjin District Submission of Entries:
Each entry can submit only one design entry. Both digital and physical materials are required:
• Digital Submission: All entries are to be submitted as digital files on official website (http://project.seoul.go.kr) within the deadline.
• Submission by personal delivery or per post: All entries and models should be submitted by personal delivery or per post to the designated submission address within the deadline. Materials include full size projects boards and a scale model. For more information, go to: project.seoul.go.kr
|
©Bauen+Wohnen
 An article, Trois tourettes et un jardin (Three Turrets and a Garden) by Swiss landscape architect, Valérie Hoffmeyer, in Werk, Bauen + Wohnen, is another recent example highlighting the value of green space in the design of mid-rise residential buildings. At a time when developers endeavor to maximize their profits by turning to highrise buildings, even when higher density is at stake, referencing the Garden City concept has been turning up as a more frequent theme.
Read more… 
Budapest’s Nuugati Railway Terminal has reached it capacity, expecially when based on the future needs of the station. To date, the common practice of backing trains out after unloading to turn them around was time-consuming, and, as a result, had maximized the capacity for the terminal. The new plan foresees the hall’s extended tracts to be located underground, so as to create through traffic. Read more… Young Architects in Competitions When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality 
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset? This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions. Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link: https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/ 
Boardwalk photo: Courtesy Atlantic Beach
Boardwalks, especially on oceanfront locations, have a pretty universal look. But how they fit into their local context is another matter. Topography, real estate and commerce all play a role in their function, and to some extent, design. In the case of Miami Beach, it’s primarily a promenade; Brooklyn’s 2.7 mile Coney Island boardwalk stretching all the way to Brighton Beach is a mixture of promenade and commerce, with the latter at both ends. In the case of Atlantic City, it’s mostly about retail.
Read more… 
Winning entry – Hyunjoon Min Architects Office
National Library of Korea Data Preservation Center Competition
Retrofitting existing buildings is nothing new. The abandonment of old factory structures, especially in the northeast of the U.S., has been occurring at a rapid pace ever since those businesses ceased to be profitable in the face of foreign competition. However, in North America, retrofitting those structures has seldom been the subject of a design competition. In Korea, the recent plethora of design competitions for all types of projects has also included several for providing a new life for abandoned buildings. Read more… Countryside Dilemmas – New Rural Planning 
1st Place – ©Tianjin University Team
Planning used to be at the bottom of Chinese students’ lists of design priorities. One western architect, whose firm was at the forefront in the design and implementation of numerous planning projects in China, surmised that planning was an area that received little attention in the university curricula. So when planning for a major metropolitan area has occurred, the Chinese have almost always turned to outside international firms for ideas and implementation. Read more… The Chicago Architecture Club Shines the Spotlight on Another Endangered Landmark 
Public Pool Image: ©Perkins&Will
What do Bertrad Goldberg and Helmut Jahn have in common? Besides having high-profile buildings threatened by demolition, both served as subject matter for two competitions sponsored by the Chicago Architecture Club (CAC)—raising public consciousness about their impending fate. They both produced buildings in a city famous for its architecture that have been abandoned: Goldberg’s Future Prentice Women’s Hospital, demolished in 2014 after a valiant effort by preservationists to save it from the wrecking ball; and Jahn’s Thompson Center, now the object of a similar effort by the State of Illinois to sell it to a developer. Read more… |
