The New Jongno-gu Government Complex Design Competition
Sponsor: Seoul Metropolitan Government Jongno-gu
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Type: Open, international
Language: Korean, English
Fee: None
Eligibility: Both Korean and foreign licensed architects can participate, and one team can be made of up to three architects but one appointed representative should carry out the registration.
Timetable:
20 August 2020 – Registration deadline
27 August – Submission deadline
Honoraria:
First Prize – Commission to develop design
Second Prize – 80,000,000 KRW (about $66,700 US)
Third Prize – 60,000,000 KRW (about $50,000 US)
Fourth Prize – 40,000,000 KRW (about $33,300 US)
Fifth Prize – 20,000,000 KRW (about $17,000 US)
Jury:
• Kim Dong-Jin – Hongik University / architecture
• Yongmi Kim – GEUMSUNG Architects & Associates
• Junsung, Kim – Graduate school of architecture, Konkuk University / architecture
• Insoo Park – PARKiz
• Hyun Seo – Seoul Nat'l Univ.
• Na-Kyoung Yu – Principal, Place Making Associates Co.
• Kwanseok Lee – Kyung Hee University
• Kiok Lee – PHILLIP Architects
• Chung Kee Lee – University of Seoul
• KIM, Hyundai – Preparatory Jury
Design Challenge:
This competition aims to select a future-oriented and sustainable proposal for the governmental office complex that will accommodate both memory of the past as well as futuristic creativity. It will be constructed on the current Jongno-gu Office site which has many historical and cultural layers in order to enhance working efficiency and to create a public and community space for residents of Jongno-gu.
The site of the Jongno-gu Office is of great historical value. It is presumed to be the home of Jeong Do-jeon, a founding contributor of the Joseon Dynasty. In addition, several historical and cultural resources and historical spaces linked to both the Joseon and modern eras are concentrated and distributed around this area. On the east side of the site are modern middle and high-rise buildings, and beyond that are buildings that maintain the traditional architecture and horizontal form of the Joseon Dynasty.
Site summary:
• Site Area: 8,622.3m²
• Total Floor Area: 66,970m² (Total Floor Area and each program area can be changed within ±3% of required area)
• Estimated construction cost: KRW 168,161 million (approx $140,428,520 US)
• Design Cost: KRW 8,904 million, including VAT and Securities for Damage Liability (approx $7,436,950 US)
Available Materials:
The following materials are provided on official website and only registered entrants can have access: •Design Competition Guidelines (Korean and English)
•[Attachment] Detailed Guideline of Programs (Korean and English) •Forms (design description cover form, relevant documents, etc.)
•Task Instruction (Korean)
•Project Site Digital Map
•Site Survey Drawing (* Surveyed as of 2015, and the surrounding condition may differ slightly)
•Drawings of main building of Jongno-gu Office (plan, elevation, section, and structural plan)
•Safety Inspection Report of main building (Korean)
•Abbreviated report on the first and second drilling investigation of buried cultural properties (Korean)
•Maintenance plan decision
•Breakdown on design service cost
•Report on the actual status of preservation values including signboards and monuments (Korean)
•Drawings of temporary land dividing line
•Link to the project site of the 3D spatial information system in Seoul https://vo.la/X1R8
•Construction Documents for underground public pedestrian passage connected to Gwanghwamun Station related to Urban Environment Improvement Project in Cheongjin District Submission of Entries:
Each entry can submit only one design entry. Both digital and physical materials are required:
• Digital Submission: All entries are to be submitted as digital files on official website (http://project.seoul.go.kr) within the deadline.
• Submission by personal delivery or per post: All entries and models should be submitted by personal delivery or per post to the designated submission address within the deadline. Materials include full size projects boards and a scale model. For more information, go to: project.seoul.go.kr
|
Young Architects in Competitions When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality 
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset? This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions. Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link: https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/ Hangang District Urban Design International Master Competition
1st place entry by Dominique Perrault Architecture (image ©Dominique Perrault Architect)
China’s planning priorities for their urban areas experienced a sharp turn after the post-Mao reforms took place. During the early post-WWII period, when Soviet influence in the early urbanization of China dominated, industrial development took precedence over all other issues, with heritage, conservation, residential planning, and the amenities associated with it, being almost entirely neglected. Read more…
Winning design by ©Moreau Kusunoki /Genton
Although one might normally assume that local firms participating in a competition might have a clear advantage over foreign competitors, this has seldom been the case: just see Sydney’s Opera House, won by a Danish architect, and Toronto’s City Hall, won by a Finn—as evidence that well devised competition briefs as adequate documentation can create a level playing field for potential competitors, regardless of their location.
Read more…
Jensen Architects – Winning entry (Honor Award) Beginning in 2011, Architecture at Zero, a collaboration between the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) and the California chapter of the American Institute of Architects (AIACA), was established to investigate the role architecture might play in reducing energy consumption in the built environment. Since then, every year has seen a new site and building type selected as a design challenge in what has become one of the world’s most interesting international competitions.
As a sign of its mounting popularity, the competition received 237 registrations from 49 countries and, according to the professional adviser, about 150 entries— all this during the Covid-19 virus pandemic, when all were compelled to work from home. Read more… An Ideas Competition in Opposition to a Concrete Design
Entry by TheeAe (Image © TheeAe)
In early 2020, a group advocating a new approach to the design of the Los Angeles Museum of Art (LACMA)—The Citizens’ Brigade to Save LACMA—organized a competition to counter an existing design by the Swiss Architect Peter Zumthor. Already commissioned by the LACMA administration, the project is slated to begin almost immediately with the demolition of four LACMA buildings—three existing and one new. Moreover, the existing plan to incorporate all of the existing collections under one roof isn’t covered by the Zumthor plan. This obvious lack of exhibit space was the focus of a query by the Ahmanson Foundation, a major donor of artworks to LACMA in the past. Upon not receiving assurances from LACMA that those donated works would be exhibited, but possibly held in storage and hidden from public view, the Foundation cut all ties with LACMA. Finally, the plan by Zumthor foresees the new structure not only occupying much of the new space created by demolition, but extends part of the new building over Wiltshire Boulevard. As one might anticipate from Zumthor, the construction of the structure is also primarily of concrete, thereby raising the cost per SF. So no matter how highly finished this material turns out to be, it does in essence represent a brutalist structure replacing an eclectic ensemble. Read more… National Railway Museum Central Hall (U.K.)
Winning entry by Feilden Fowles (image © Fielden Fowles)
If one were to search for a railway museum in the U.K., London would seem to be an obvious choice. But, as it happens, its location is in the northeastern city of York, far from the major cultural and economic centers of the country. But despite its distance from the major metropolitan areas to the south and west, York has managed to become the focal point of research into the history of rail in the U.K., supplemented by a major museum. Here we are not just talking about some posters, but sheds replete with a large collection of vintage trains. Read more… |
