Musee National des Beaux-Arts du Quebec CompetitionSponsor: MNBAQ Type: open, international, 2-stage Language: communication and correspondence in English and French; all contractual documents and presentations must be in French. Eligibility: licensed architects and architectural firms Awards:
175,000CAD – to each competitor who presents a conceptual proposal to conform to the requirements of contractual documents
25,000CAD – to 10 teams not selected to continue to stage 2 Timetable:
17 July, 2009 – registration deadline
21 August, 2009 – submission deadline
4 September, 2009 – jury choices are announced
6 November, 2009 – deadline for stage 1 proposals
5 February, 2010 – deadline for stage 2 proposals
late february, 2010 – winner announced Jury:
Charles-Mathieu Brunelle, director of Montreal Nature Museum
Esther Trepanier, executive director of the museum
John Porter, chair of the Museum’s foundation
Jacques White, architect, director of the Ecole d’architecture, University Laval
Narsine Seraji, architect and urban planner, Atelier Seraji Architectes et associes
Xavier Geyter, architect, XDGA Architecten, Belgium
Andre Bourassa, chair of OAQ
Peter Murphy, architect, Town and Country planning, Quebec City Design Challenge:
The intent of this competition is to create a new pavilion for the museum and redefine the exhibition areas. The principal objective is to increase exhibition capacity and make it possible to increase the percentage of permanent collection on display, from 4.5% to 10%. An underground link will connect the new pavilion to the Charles Baillairge pavilion. This competition seeks to choose a distinctive project that will integrate the functions of a museum into the natural and historic setting of the Parc des Champs-de-Bataille and the urban fabric bordering it. The new image of the museum must reflect the 21st century and the dynamism of Quebec City. The principal elements of the project are as follows:
-gross surface area to be built (including the link): 10,120 sq. m.
-outdoor facilities: 3,1155 sq. m.
-refurbishing: 200 sq. m. For more information, go to: www.mnba.qc.ca Email: agrandissement@mnba.qc.ca |
The Makasiiniranta South Harbor Competition
 Helsinki South Harbour and Tori Quarter Suomen Ilmakuva Helsinki. Image credit/ Tietoa Finland, Janne Hirvonen
As a prelude to a competition for the design of a new Architecture and Design Museum to be located in Helsinki’s South Harbor, the City of Finland staged an open competition to establish a roadmap for the future redevelopment of the Makasiiniranta harbor area, the last old harbor area to be transformed for public use in Helsinki. The competition for the museum is scheduled to take place later this year; but the entire surrounding area has come up with a plan to review improvements for the entire harbor environment.
Read more… Young Architects in Competitions When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality 
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset? This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions. Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link: https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/ Vltava Philharmonic Hall Design Competition 
View to Concert Hall from bridge ©BIG
Classical music is still part of a vibrant musical scene in Prague, with at least four principal venues hosting concerts, ballet and opera. As a modern European city, the only missing venue from these choices is a state of the art concert hall. Other European neighbors have also recently staged competitions for such projects: Munich, won by Cukrowicz Nachbaur Architekten of Bregenz, Austria; Belgrade, won by AL_A of London; and Vilnius, Lithuania, won by Arquivio Architects of Spain. It should be noted, however, that one of the most important competitions for a concert hall, not only in Europe, but the world, was the 1961 Berlin Philharmonic hall competition, won by Hans Scharoun (below). It was the interior of that building, in particular, that served as a model for many others that followed, one of the first being Los Angeles’ Disney Hall by Frank Gehry. Read more… Budapest’s Nyugati Rail Station Competition 
Image courtesy Budapest Development Agency ©Grimshaw
Completed in 1877, Budapest’s Nyugati Railway Station has witnessed many of the twists and turns of Hungarian history: the Austro-Hungarian Empire, revolutions of post-World War I and 1956, and various shades of expansion and shrinkage in their territory. Its important location in Europe’s history as a contested land in southeastern Europe has not only served as a path for armies of conquest, but as a matter of great interest for major powers. Amid all the changes it has experienced, Hungary, and Budapest in particular, has retained a fascination for outsiders, making it one of Europe’s high profile tourist attractions. Read more… A Quest for that Elusive Connective Formula 
First Place: Pedestrian perspective from Parliament – Zeidler Architecture in association with David Chipperfield Architects
How do you find a common thread that can connect an eclectic collection of buildings, visually as well as physically, all located within a one-block site, located just across from Canada’s Parliament building in Ottawa. To identify this common thread that could tie everything together, the client turned to a design competition for answers. With the aid of consultants, [phase eins] from Berlin and experts from Canada’s’ own Université de Montréal’s School of Architecture, the client turned to an invited international format to finally settle on six teams that could rethink the site. Read more… Vilnius Railway Station and Public Square Competition 
Vilnius Station competition Image: ©Zaha Hadid Architects
In European cities, recent history has seen their central railway stations become the subject of upgrades, or totally new projects, many of them springing up in Eastern Europe. In most cases, the focus on this phenomena occurred several decades after earth-shaking political events. In Germany it was the construction of a new main central station (Hauptbahnhof) shortly after the reunification of Germany and Berlin. in Estonia, and now Lithuania, it has occurred after the independence of those countries in conjunction with the dissolution of the Soviet Union. And in Hungary, it was the subject of a recent competition encompassing a large area surrounding the station. Read More… |
