Minimal Shelter Space International Design Competition Proposals for improving evacuation environment inside Japanese evacuation centers Sponsor: Alliance for Humantarian Architecture Type: International, open, ideas Fees: none Languages: Japanese and English Locaton: Sendai, Japan Introduction Record-breaking rainfall and subsequent flooding, hurricanes, earthquakes, volcano eruptions, heatwaves, and forest fires, humanity is experiencing devastating natural disasters with no signs of easing. Our homes built to protect us from harsh nature are becoming less effective, and in some cases, we have to abandon our homes for survival, whether temporal or permanent. It is becoming ever more critical to prepare for such dire situations at the best of our abilities. Japan, one of the countries consistently under the threat of various disasters all year long, has experienced many throughout the years. Through these devastating experiences, the government has developed standard disaster evacuation guidelines. Based on the current guidelines, how much of this deals with spatial conditions of evacuees is still questionable. Are we still left to sleep on cold school gymnasium floors next to a stranger without privacy? Typically in Japan, public facilities (primarily elementary schools) serve as evacuation centers for that school district community, but are also open to anyone in need nearby. Evacuees of all ages and family structures coming there are squeezed into the school gymnasium, spending nights there on the hardwood floor. There is need for improving this inhumane condition among individuals and groups. We are starting to see a few evacuation centers with cardboard beds and partitions. Alliance for Humanitarian Architecture would like to start a conversation about the spatial environmental conditions during evacuation in Japan through this competition and share our current situations and ideas for improvement. We look forward to seeing a submission from all over the world with diverse yet realistic ideas. Schedule: October 3, 2021 – Competition announcement (Registration) December 10, 2021 – 1st stage submission deadline December 19, 2021 – Announcement of the finalists January 14, 2022 – Submission of finalists built projects January 15 to 27, 2022 – Exhibition of submission panels and finalist projects January 22, 2022 – Competition Final, symposium, award ceremony Assignment: - Submit proposals for private space of 2m x 2m x 2m (4㎡) per person inside a school gymnasium in Japan during disaster evacuation.
- Duration for the use of 10 continuous days or more.
- Construction (material) costs should be under 30,000JPY with materials available in Japan.
All competition participants must register through Alliance for Humanitarian Architecture’s competition website. If you are participating as a team, please fill in the representing team member, and fill the other team members name at the affiliation section. Once the registration is completed, a registration number will be emailed to your registered email address. Please submit your proposals with this number, and do not include any names that reveal the individual or affiliation in your submission. Registration: All competition participants must register through Alliance for Humanitarian Architecture’s competition website. If you are participating as a team, please fill in the representing team member, and fill the other team members name at the affiliation section. Once the registration is completed, a registration number will be emailed to your registered email address. Please submit your proposals with this number, and do not include any names that reveal the individual or affiliation in your submission. Submission Requirements Diagram showing how to affix entry number to submission. First Stage: 1 : One A1 size board (vertical) with sketches, drawings, illustrations describing your proposal. Submission to be in PDF data (under 20MB). No physical panel submissions accepted. 2 : Design statement (A4/1page, font size 11point) ※Finalists and notable projects will be selected during the 1st stage for the panel exhibition in January. Final stage: The selected finalist will be physically built and showcased in public at the Sendai Forus gallery “TURN ANOTHER ROUND” for the final and public selection process. The final presentation in front of the jury, followed by a symposium, is scheduled for January 22, 2022, in Sendai, Japan. All selected finalists must be available for their final presentation either in person or virtually through video conferencing. Each finalist will receive 50,000JPY for traveling and accommodation to Sendai Judging criteria: Judging will rely on the values of each judge, but will mainly focus on; practicality, ease of assembly, comfort during all seasons, the flexibility of configuration and use, safety, number of parts, weight, reusability, longevity, aesthetics, storage, and distribution logistics. Awards: Grand award (1) Certificate of Merit, 100,000JPY (approx. USD900), Gift Award of excellence (3) Certificate of Merit, Gift Other requirements and notes: Due to travel restrictions imposed by the Japanese government under the COVID-19 pandemic, all finalists must submit building instructions to construct the design. As such, specified materials must be available in Japan or delivered by the later instructed date. Jury: 1st stage – Alliance for Humanitarian Architecture Final stage – TBA (public voting will take place during the first half of the exhibition) Contact information: [email protected] Any inquiries regarding the competition, please contact the competition organizer at the following email address. Alliance for Humanitarian Architecture [email protected] Website: https://en.allianceforhumanitarianarchitect |
Completed IMEX by Tuck Hinton Architects. Photo courtesy Anecdote It is not often that we look back to a competition that occurred three decades ago that was also covered in detail by COMPETITIONS (Vol. 4, #4; pp. 14-27). What made the Chattanooga IMAX different back in 1994 was that the article covering that competition was authored by Prof. Marleen Davis, then Dean of the University of Tennessee’s School of Architecture and a member of the jury panel. This was not just a short article, covering the high points of the competition with a few talking points about the winning design. This 4,000+ word document also described in detail the jury’s observations about all the finalists, including the honorable mentions—one of the few times we have gained such a detailed glimpse in this country from the inside of the competition process. Read more… Preparation and Organization of Design Competitions [phase 1] Benjamin Hossbach / Christian Lehmhaus / Christine Eichelmann 210 × 230 mm, 192 pp. over 600 images softcover ISBN 978-3-86922-316-2 (English) ISBN 978-3-86922-240-0 (German) Dom Publishers €48 in EU (For price abroad, see below) Founded in 1998 in Berlin, Phase 1 has been a principal player in the organization and facilitation of design competitions, not only in Germany, but abroad as well. The accomplishments of the firm have been well documented in three volumes—The Architecture of Competitions—beginning in 2i006. Whereas these books mainly focused on the results of the competitions they have administered, the present work, Fundamentals of Competition Management, takes one from the very beginnings of the competition process to its conclusion. The authors envisioned the publication as “three three books in one: one „blue book“ with example projects, one „yellow book“ with statements and the „white book“ with the actual guideline to competition management.” Although there have been a number of handbooks covering the administration of designcompetitions a study covering the entire process in such detail is a welcome addition to the the literature in this field. As a contribution to this important democratic process that has yielded exceptional design for decades, this volume is not only valid for Europe, but a current overview of the process for those globally who wish to raise the level of design by virtue of a design competition. -Ed Foreign institutions wishing to obtain a copy of the book will recieve a discount to cover the cost of foreign shipping. To obtain a copy for that offer, go to: [email protected] Winning entry by Luca Poian Forms Image ©Filippo Bolognese images Good design seldom happens in a vacuum. And so it was with an international competition for a new mosque in Preston, U.K. A mid-sized city of 95,000, and located in Lancashire near the west coast and almost equally distant from London and Glasgow, Preston has a storied past, going all the way back to the Romans and the late Middle Ages, where it was the site of significant battles. During the Industrial Revolution, the city prospered, and it was not until after World War II that Preston experienced the British version of the U.S. Rust Belt. In the meantime, the city has experienced an upswing in economic activity, with an unemployment rate of only 3%. Aside from the appearance of new industries, the city has benefitted from the establishment of Central Lancashire University (CLU), which employs over 3,000 faculty and staff, and, as such, is one of the regions major employers. Any new university requires new facilities, and one of the most outstanding examples of this at CLU was the new Student Centre and Plaza, a result of a 2016 RIBA-sponsored competition won by Hawkins/Brown Read More
Changdong Station winner – image ©D & B Partners Architects
Whereas international competitions for real projects have become a rarity lately, Korea is a welcome exception. Among the plethora of competition announcements we receive almost weekly, several have ended with foreign firms as winners. But the history of welcoming international participants does go back several years. One notable early example was the Incheon Airport competition, won by Fentress Bradburn Architects (1962-70).
Among the more recent successes of foreign firms was the Busan Opera House competition, won by Snøhetta (2013-) and the Sejong Museum Gardens competition, won by Office OU, Toronto (2016-2023).
Read more… 1st Place: Zaha Hadid Architects – night view from river – Render by Negativ Arriving to board a ferry boat or cruise ship used to be a rather mundane experience. If you had luggage, you might be able to drop it off upon boarding, assuming that the boarding operation was sophisticated enough. In any case, the arrival experience was nothing to look forward to. I recall boarding the SS United States for a trip to Europe in the late 1950s. Arriving at the pier in New York, the only thought any traveler had was to board that ocean liner as soon as possible, find one’s cabin, and start exploring. If you were in New York City and arriving early, a nearby restaurant or cafe would be your best bet while passing time before boarding. Read more… Helsinki Central Library, by ALA Architects (2012-2018) The world has experienced a limited number of open competitions over the past three decades, but even with diminishing numbers, some stand out among projects in their categories that can’t be ignored for the high quality and degree of creativity they revealed. Included among those are several invited competitions that were extraordinary in their efforts to explore new avenues of institutional and museum design. Some might ask why the Vietnam Memorial is not mentioned here. Only included in our list are competitions that were covered by us, beginning in 1990 with COMPETITIONS magazine to the present day. As for what category a project under construction (Science Island), might belong to or fundraising still in progress (San Jose’s Urban Confluence or the Cold War Memorial competition, Wisconsin), we would classify the former as “built” and wait and see what happens with the latter—keeping our fingers crossed for a positive outcome. Read More… 2023 Teaching and Innovation Farm Lab Graduate Student Honor Award by USC (aerial view) Architecture at Zero competitions, which focus on the theme, Design Competition for Decarbonization, Equity and Resilience in California, have been supported by numerous California utilities such as Southern California Edison, PG&E, SoCAl Gas, etc., who have recognized the need for better climate solutions in that state as well as globally. Until recently, most of these competitions were based on an ideas only format, with few expectations that any of the winning designs would actually be realized. The anticipated realization of the 2022 and 2023 competitions suggests that some clients are taking these ideas seriously enough to go ahead with realization. Read more… |