European Parliament Design Competition: Paul-Henri SPAAK Building and its surroundings
View of the Paul-Henri SPAAK Building with Parc Leopold in the background and Place du Luxembourg in the foreground ©Façade and hemicycle: architect Michel Boucquillon
Sponsor: European Parliament
Competition management: AT-Osborne-Tractebel Engineering, Brussels, Belgium and [phase eins], Architects, Berlin, Germany
(It is intended to have the procedure approved by the uia (Union Internationale des Architectes). www.uia-architectes.org)
Type: RfQ two-stage competition
Fee: none
Language: English
Process: Shortlisting of up to 15 firms for the competition stage
Timetable:
9 July 2020 – RfQ qualifications submission deadline
December 2020 – Deadlines for submission of entries
January 2021 – Jury session and announcement of winner
Compensation packages and awards:
Each competitor who submits a detailed and assessable design concept in accordance with the requirements in the competition brief will receive a flat-rate fee of EUR 75,000, excluding VAT. as compensation for the expenses incurred, against receipt of an invoice in full and final settlement.
In addition, the Jury will award 5 prize winners among the submitted designconcepts and will award prizes among them. The sum of the prizes will amount to 400.000 €, net of VAT
Jury:
11 jurors with a vote:
• Four general jurors
– Rainer Wieland, Vice-President of the European Parliament
– Pedro Silva Pereira, Vice-President of the European Parliament
– Rudy Vervoort, Minister President of the Brussels-Capital Region
– Bety Waknine, Head of the Brussels Planning and Heritage Regional Public Service
• Seven architectural jurors
– Prof. Marilyne Andersen, Physicist and Environmental specialist, Lausanne, Switzerland
– Kristiaan Borret, Urban Planner, BouwMeester Architect of the Brussels Region, Belgium
– Manuelle Gautrand, Architect, Paris, France
– Dorte Mandrup, Architect, Copenhagen, Denmark
– Carme Pigem, Architect, Olot, Spain
– Kazuyo Sejima, Architect, Tokyo, Japan
Dimitri Tenezakis, Architect, Head of Luxembourg and Strasbourg Major Construction Project Unit, Unit – DG INLO – European Parliament.
Design Challenge
European Parliament- Paul- Henri SPAAK Building
The Paul-Henri SPAAK Building is part of an estate of around ten buildings with a total area of some 665,000 sqm. The gross floor area of the current building is around 84,000 sqm and could be increased within existing urban planning constraints. It houses the Chamber of the European Parliament in Brussels for its 705 Members from all over the European Union.
The European Parliament, as a multicultural and multilingual assembly where no fewer than 24 languages are routinely spoken and interpreted, embodies the European motto ‘United in diversity’. The main building of the European Parliament’s Brussels site, the Paul-Henri SPAAK Building, houses not only
the Chamber, where Members meet in par-sessions , but also facilities for holding parliamentary committee meetings, organising press conferences and welcoming visitors.
Objectives
The task of the competition is to provide the best solutions for the renewal of the European Parliament Chamber building and its surrounding area. The future building must create the link between the urban and the natural, and become a symbol and integral part of the city and of the landscape.
The winning proposal is expected to be a paradigm of architecture with an outstanding visual identity for the building and the Chamber Hall with a strong emphasis on environmental aspects. The design is to support the architectural quality of the city and will resonate with the European citizens as a representation of the power of their voice.
Offering flexible spaces, the building should be easily adaptable to the EP’s development over time and at the same time constitute a model of sustainable and regenerative building.
Program
The prospective building will contain:
• the Chamber Hall, which will accommodate all Members as well as visitors;
• parliamentary committee and trilogue rooms;
• a reception, meeting and educational area for citizens;
• protocol areas;
• media areas;
• areas for cultural activities;
• areas for social interaction;
• support areas for all European Parliament activities.
Functions should be organized in a very user-friendly manner, with natural visibility that minimizes signage and with clear routes for users, including protocol, media, visitors and logistics. Visitors should furthermore be able
to follow a route that will give them a unique experience. Building flexibility should be such as to allow, in the short term, for multiple uses to be made of areas and, in the long term, for functions to be easily altered.
Location of the site
The Paul-Henri SPAAK Building is located in Brussels, capital of Belgium, and Europe. It is situated in Quartier Leopold, between rue Wiertz and Parc Leopold, on the edge of the estate of the European Parliament’s buildings.
The building is located at the junction of two urban planning zones in terms of form and functions and is next to a large park in Brussels, Parc Leopold, where various cultural and scientific establishments are located.
For more information and to apply, go to:
www.european-parliament-design-competition.eu
|
Helsinki Central Library, by ALA Architects (2012-2018)
The world has experienced a limited number of open competitions over the past three decades, but even with diminishing numbers, some stand out among projects in their categories that can’t be ignored for the high quality and degree of creativity they revealed. Included among those are several invited competitions that were extraordinary in their efforts to explore new avenues of institutional and museum design. Some might ask why the Vietnam Memorial is not mentioned here. Only included in our list are competitions that were covered by us, beginning in 1990 with COMPETITIONS magazine to the present day. As for what category a project under construction (Science Island), might belong to or fundraising still in progress (San Jose’s Urban Confluence or the Cold War Memorial competition, Wisconsin), we would classify the former as “built” and wait and see what happens with the latter—keeping our fingers crossed for a positive outcome.
Read More…
Young Architects in Competitions
When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset?
This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions.
Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link:
https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/
RUR model perspective – ©RUR
New Kaohsiung Port and Cruise Terminal, Taiwan (2011-2020)
Reiser+Umemoto RUR Architecture PC/ Jesse Reiser – U.S.A.
with
Fei & Cheng Associates/Philip T.C. Fei –R.O.C. (Tendener)
This was probably the last international open competition result that was built in Taiwan. A later competition for the Keelung Harbor Service Building Competition, won by Neil Denari of the U.S., the result of a shortlisting procedure, was not built. The fact that the project by RUR was eventually completed—the result of the RUR/Fei & Cheng’s winning entry there—certainly goes back to the collaborative role of those to firms in winning the 2008 Taipei Pop Music Center competition, a collaboration that should not be underestimated in setting the stage for this competition.
Read more…
Winning entry ©Herzog de Meuron
In visiting any museum, one might wonder what important works of art are out of view in storage, possibly not considered high profile enough to see the light of day? In Korea, an answer to this question is in the making.
It can come as no surprise that museums are running out of storage space. This is not just the case with long established “western” museums, but elsewhere throughout the world as well. In Seoul, South Korea, such an issue has been addressed by planning for a new kind of storage facility, the Seouipul Open Storage Museum. The new institution will house artworks and artifacts of three major museums in Seoul: the Seoul Museum of Modern Art, the Seoul Museum of History, and the Seoul Museum of Craft Art.
Read more…
Belfast Looks Toward an Equitable and Sustainable Housing Model
Birdseye view of Mackie site ©Matthew Lloyd Architects
If one were to look for a theme that is common to most affordable housing models, public access has been based primarily on income, or to be more precise, the very lack of it. Here it is no different, with Belfast’s homeless problem posing a major concern. But the competition also hopes to address another of Belfast’s decades-long issues—its religious divide. There is an underlying assumption here that religion will play no part in a selection process. The competition’s local sponsor was “Take Back the City,” its membership consisting mainly of social advocates. In setting priorities for the housing model, the group interviewed potential future dwellers as well as stakeholders to determine the nature of this model. Among those actions taken was the “photo- mapping of available land in Belfast, which could be used to tackle the housing crisis. Since 2020, (the group) hosted seminars that brought together international experts and homeless people with the goal of finding solutions. Surveys and workshops involving local people, housing associations and council duty-bearers have explored the potential of the Mackie’s site.” This research was the basis for the competition launched in 2022.
Read more…
Alster Swimming Pool after restoration (2023)
Linking Two Competitions with Three Modernist Projects
Hardly a week goes by without the news of another architectural icon being threatened with demolition. A modernist swimming pool in Hamburg, Germany belonged in this category, even though the concrete shell roof had been placed under landmark status. When the possibility of being replaced by a high-rise building, it came to the notice of architects at von Gerkan Marg Partners (gmp), who in collaboration with schlaich bergermann partner (sbp), developed a feasibility study that became the basis for the decision to retain and refurbish the building.
Read more…
|