A Symbol of Gratitude: The Tri An Monument Competition ©Grega Vezjak Architect For residents of Louisville, Kentucky, it would come as no surprise that the city’s Vietnamese community would support a competition commemorating the friendship and support of the Americans both in Vietnam and the U.S. and our welcome for the Vietnamese people who have arrived in this country. The foundation established to realize this concept was named “Tri An,” which means “deep gratitude.” According to the competition brief, “It is important to recognize the numerous humanitarian efforts and good deeds done by the U.S. military and the many Americans who went far beyond the call of duty to help the South Vietnamese people. As is the case with many non-government supported projects, this one also had a patron who lent his support to project, Yung Nguyen, the local founder and patron of the Tri Ân foundation, also the founder of a high-tech firm. To administer the competition, the foundation engaged the services of a local architecture firm, Bravura, which had a notable track record in memorial competitions, having previously acted as professional adviser for the acclaimed Patriots Peace Memorial competition in Louisville. In setting the bar for the anticipated winner, the competition brief stated that the design: - Be unique;
- Be dramatic, timeless, and contemplative;
- Have many levels of meaning;
- Have the seductive power to invite a closer look, even to the casual observer;
- Be in harmony with the landscape, and be compatible with the other features and uses of the park in which it will reside;
- Be a creative use of the hillside site; incorporating its views, topography, and natural wooded backdrop;
- Successfully convey the Overriding Purpose and Interpretive Themes stated in these Guidelines.
To attract the widest possible audience, the organizers decided on an international, open and anonymous, two-stage competition as the best model. It was decided to award three finalists the opportunity to have their designs equally reviewed for the possible realization of the project in a second phase. For their efforts, each was to receive compensation of US $4,000. To adjudicate the process, a four-person jury was empaneled: • Susan Rademacher, FASLA Landscape Lecturer, Writer, Curator, Consultant & Designer • Yung Nguyen Immigrant, Successful Entrepreneur & Founder of the Tri Ân Foundation • P.Q. Phan Composer, Educator & Professor of Music at Indiana University • David M. Biagi Architect & former Director of the University of Kentucky School of Architecture Of the 128 entries this event attracted from around the world, the choice of the three finalists and ten honorable mentions certainly illustrated the international character of this competition: Finalists – ($4,000 each) • Grega Vezjak, Architect (Winner) Bilje, Miren-Kostanjevica, Slovenija • David Chisholm CMC Architects, Prague, Czech Republic • Jordan Hines, Informal Office, llc, Lexington, KY USA Honorable Mentions • Young Song, Buffalo, New York • Yongwon Kwon, New York, NY • Yi-Chen Lee, Taipei, Taiwan • Rob Kiester, Denver, Colorado • Tommy Haddock, San Francisco, California • Palita Simapaisal, Bangkok, Thailand • Tom Lucey, Perth, Australia • Justin Arleo, Chandler, Arizona • Anh Nguyen, Riverside, California • Tianyu Wu, Athens, Georgia The Final Selection Process The three premiated finalists were submitted to a review by the Tri Ân foundation, assisted by the competition adviser, James Walters. In the final evaluation process, it was determined that the very expressive entry by David Chisholm of CMC Architects had to be eliminated from consideration because it well exceeded the announced budget of $850,000 by almost $350,000. As a result, the entry by Grega Vezjak of Slovenia was a unanimous choice for the realization of the project. It should be noted that the jury’s choice of Vezjak matched that of the jury from the high-profile 2015 Christchurch Earthquake Memorial Competition in New Zealand, also won by the Slovenian architect over 340 entries from around the world. That memorial is slated for its dedication in February. Winning Entry Grega Vezjak, Architect Bilje, Miren-Kostanjevica, Slovenija Images ©Grega Vezak Architect Finalist David Chisholm, CMC Architects Team Members: Vít Máslo + Adria Ferrer Prague, Czech Republic Images ©CMC Architects Finalist Jordan Hines, Informal Office, llc Team member: Erin Ruhl Lexington, KY USA Image ©Jordan Hines Honorable Mentions Jin Young Song Buffalo, NY USA Image ©Jin Young Song Yongwon Kwon New York, NY Image ©Jin Yongwon Kwon Yi-Chen Lee Taipei, Taiwan Image ©Yi-Chen Lee Rob Kiester Denver, CO USA Image ©Rob Kiester Tommy Haddock San Francisco, CA USA Image ©Tommy Haddock Palita Simapaisal Bangkok, Thailand Image ©Palita Simapaisal Tom Lucey Perth, Australia Image ©Tom Lucey Justin Arleo Chandler, AZ USA Image ©Justin Arleo Anh Nguyen Riverside, CA USA Image ©Anh Nguyen Tianyu Wu Athens, GA USA Image ©Tianyu Wu
|
Completed IMEX by Tuck Hinton Architects. Photo courtesy Anecdote It is not often that we look back to a competition that occurred three decades ago that was also covered in detail by COMPETITIONS (Vol. 4, #4; pp. 14-27). What made the Chattanooga IMAX different back in 1994 was that the article covering that competition was authored by Prof. Marleen Davis, then Dean of the University of Tennessee’s School of Architecture and a member of the jury panel. This was not just a short article, covering the high points of the competition with a few talking points about the winning design. This 4,000+ word document also described in detail the jury’s observations about all the finalists, including the honorable mentions—one of the few times we have gained such a detailed glimpse in this country from the inside of the competition process. Read more… Preparation and Organization of Design Competitions [phase 1] Benjamin Hossbach / Christian Lehmhaus / Christine Eichelmann 210 × 230 mm, 192 pp. over 600 images softcover ISBN 978-3-86922-316-2 (English) ISBN 978-3-86922-240-0 (German) Dom Publishers €48 in EU (For price abroad, see below) Founded in 1998 in Berlin, Phase 1 has been a principal player in the organization and facilitation of design competitions, not only in Germany, but abroad as well. The accomplishments of the firm have been well documented in three volumes—The Architecture of Competitions—beginning in 2i006. Whereas these books mainly focused on the results of the competitions they have administered, the present work, Fundamentals of Competition Management, takes one from the very beginnings of the competition process to its conclusion. The authors envisioned the publication as “three three books in one: one „blue book“ with example projects, one „yellow book“ with statements and the „white book“ with the actual guideline to competition management.” Although there have been a number of handbooks covering the administration of designcompetitions a study covering the entire process in such detail is a welcome addition to the the literature in this field. As a contribution to this important democratic process that has yielded exceptional design for decades, this volume is not only valid for Europe, but a current overview of the process for those globally who wish to raise the level of design by virtue of a design competition. -Ed Foreign institutions wishing to obtain a copy of the book will recieve a discount to cover the cost of foreign shipping. To obtain a copy for that offer, go to: [email protected] Winning entry by Luca Poian Forms Image ©Filippo Bolognese images Good design seldom happens in a vacuum. And so it was with an international competition for a new mosque in Preston, U.K. A mid-sized city of 95,000, and located in Lancashire near the west coast and almost equally distant from London and Glasgow, Preston has a storied past, going all the way back to the Romans and the late Middle Ages, where it was the site of significant battles. During the Industrial Revolution, the city prospered, and it was not until after World War II that Preston experienced the British version of the U.S. Rust Belt. In the meantime, the city has experienced an upswing in economic activity, with an unemployment rate of only 3%. Aside from the appearance of new industries, the city has benefitted from the establishment of Central Lancashire University (CLU), which employs over 3,000 faculty and staff, and, as such, is one of the regions major employers. Any new university requires new facilities, and one of the most outstanding examples of this at CLU was the new Student Centre and Plaza, a result of a 2016 RIBA-sponsored competition won by Hawkins/Brown Read More
Changdong Station winner – image ©D & B Partners Architects
Whereas international competitions for real projects have become a rarity lately, Korea is a welcome exception. Among the plethora of competition announcements we receive almost weekly, several have ended with foreign firms as winners. But the history of welcoming international participants does go back several years. One notable early example was the Incheon Airport competition, won by Fentress Bradburn Architects (1962-70).
Among the more recent successes of foreign firms was the Busan Opera House competition, won by Snøhetta (2013-) and the Sejong Museum Gardens competition, won by Office OU, Toronto (2016-2023).
Read more… 1st Place: Zaha Hadid Architects – night view from river – Render by Negativ Arriving to board a ferry boat or cruise ship used to be a rather mundane experience. If you had luggage, you might be able to drop it off upon boarding, assuming that the boarding operation was sophisticated enough. In any case, the arrival experience was nothing to look forward to. I recall boarding the SS United States for a trip to Europe in the late 1950s. Arriving at the pier in New York, the only thought any traveler had was to board that ocean liner as soon as possible, find one’s cabin, and start exploring. If you were in New York City and arriving early, a nearby restaurant or cafe would be your best bet while passing time before boarding. Read more… Helsinki Central Library, by ALA Architects (2012-2018) The world has experienced a limited number of open competitions over the past three decades, but even with diminishing numbers, some stand out among projects in their categories that can’t be ignored for the high quality and degree of creativity they revealed. Included among those are several invited competitions that were extraordinary in their efforts to explore new avenues of institutional and museum design. Some might ask why the Vietnam Memorial is not mentioned here. Only included in our list are competitions that were covered by us, beginning in 1990 with COMPETITIONS magazine to the present day. As for what category a project under construction (Science Island), might belong to or fundraising still in progress (San Jose’s Urban Confluence or the Cold War Memorial competition, Wisconsin), we would classify the former as “built” and wait and see what happens with the latter—keeping our fingers crossed for a positive outcome. Read More… 2023 Teaching and Innovation Farm Lab Graduate Student Honor Award by USC (aerial view) Architecture at Zero competitions, which focus on the theme, Design Competition for Decarbonization, Equity and Resilience in California, have been supported by numerous California utilities such as Southern California Edison, PG&E, SoCAl Gas, etc., who have recognized the need for better climate solutions in that state as well as globally. Until recently, most of these competitions were based on an ideas only format, with few expectations that any of the winning designs would actually be realized. The anticipated realization of the 2022 and 2023 competitions suggests that some clients are taking these ideas seriously enough to go ahead with realization. Read more… |