St Luke’s Area Design Competition – IslingtonSponsor: Islington Council
Type: RFQ, 2 stage
Location: Islington, UK
Design Challenge: The Council is launching a design competition to appoint an exemplary team of designers to redevelop the Finsbury Leisure Centre site. The winning team will go on to develop detailed designs and a full planning application for the site.  The design competition builds on the St Luke’s Area Planning Brief adopted by the Executive in October 2014. The Brief explains how any future proposal will need to deliver much needed new leisure and community facilities, affordable homes and improved public space. Importantly, the Council wants to deliver an exemplary civic building that will bring together leisure, childcare, healthcare and local energy production under one roof. A copy of the Brief and the accompanying consultation report can be found below.  The design competition will be run over two stages. During Stage 1, organisations or consortia will complete a Pre-Qualification Questionnaire (PQQ). The PQQ asks organisations and consortia to set out their previous relevant experience to undertake the commission. Up to five organisations or consortia, which score the highest and meet our requirements, will be invited to participate in the design competition (Stage 2). During Stage 2, up to five organisations/consortia will be asked to prepare tender submissions. The tender submission must include a design submission, a number of method statements setting out how they would develop detailed designs, and a pricing schedule setting out how much they would charge for developing detailed designs.   Once submitted, the design submissions will be displayed at a public exhibition. Members of the public will be able to view and comment on the designs. Comments will be made available to the Council’s evaluation panel, which will choose the winner of the competition. The exhibition is expected to take place in early 2016 and last for approximately four weeks. The winning organisation/consortium is expected to be announced in spring 2016. The design team will then begin work on turning their design submission into a detailed design and full planning application for the site. It is expected to take around 18 months to prepare detailed designs and a full planning application. If planning permission is granted, construction could begin as early as summer 2018.  If you would like to find out more, please contact Adam Barnett by email at Adam.Barnett@Islington.gov.uk or phone on 020 7527 2987 or Eshwyn Prabhu at Eshwyn.Prabhu@Islington.gov.uk or phone on 020 7527 2450. Â
For more information, go to: http://www.islington.gov.uk/services/planning/plan_brief_major/Pages/st-lukes-area.aspx |
SWA/Balsley Wins Paveletskaya Plaza Landscape Competition 
Aerial view at night – courtesy SWA/Balsley 5+ Design
Of the nine railway stations in Moscow, Paveletskaya is the largest and one of the last of those that opened around the turn of the century. Compared to other Moscow stations, Paveletskaya, designed by Alexander Krasovsky and opened in 1900, represented a lower-key presence in its sprawling configuration, similar to palaces such as a Sans Souci without the ornamentation. The original site for the recent competition included a small park facing the station, bordered on one side by the Ring Road. Post WWII, the site was bifurcated by a road, thus separating the front entrance of the station from the grassy area facing it. Read more… Young Architects in Competitions When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset? This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions. Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link: https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/
Image Courtesy Network Rail
From Grand Central Station to King’s Cross in London, railway stations have often represented some of the major architectural accomplishments of our times. But those edifices have been primarily located in great cities. In the U.K. there are over 2,000 stations located in medium-sized, small, and rural communities. Most of those are ‘quick stop’ locations, and not the destination terminals where space requirements often result in state of the art design. In July of last year, U.K.’s Network Rail, in collaboration with the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) launched a competition to identify a concept for a design that would be suitable for the medium to small-sized rail stations, at the same time updating the program to fit the modern needs of such a facility. The competition was open internationally and received 213 entries from 34 countries last September. Read more… The Urban Confluence Silicon Valley Competition
Urban Confluence Silicon Valley winner: ©SMAR Architecture Studio
After several stops and starts over an extended period of time, the winner of the Urban Confluence Design Competition was named in early March, 2021. SMAR Architecture Studio’s The Breeze of Innovation, which prevailed over two other shortlisted finalists from the original 963 entries, won with a novel tower-like structure consisting primarily of hundreds of rods, generating energy while swaying in the wind. Read More…
Pedestrian perspective
The result of an effort from a professor at the TUM (Technische Universität München) to restore the Budludzha Monument in Bulgaria, located in a remote location on a mountain top in that country, we discovered that it originally was the result of a 1959 design competition won by the young Bulgarian architect, Georgi Stoilov. Read more… A Flawed Plan Leads to Budget Issues
Competition rendering of project looking south to Mies museum ©Herzog de Meuron
Once considered on the forefront of modern architecture in post-WWII Europe, Berlin has had its share of questionable decisions concerning important urban projects in recent history. Beginning with the rebirth of the Berlin Palace (Humboldt Forum) on the Spree by Italian architect, Franco Stella, and now followed by Herzog de Meuron’s controversial addition to Mies’s 20th Century Art Museum, the times when one could look to Berlin as a signpost of architectural innovation can only be viewed in the rear view mirror.
Read more… |
