Hemlös – Homeless Competition

Sponsor: Swedish Association of Architects; Architects without Borders, City of Stockholm and Stockholm’s stadsmission

Type: open, one-stage, anonymous

Eligibility: Open to all, students and professionals

Location: Municipality of Stockholm

Fee: none

Languages: English, Swedish

Timetable:

19 August 2015 – Submission deadline

Prizes: none

Jury:

•John Arther Ekebert, homelsess debator

• Lars Epstein, journalist, Dagens nyheter

• Fredrik Jurdell, CEO Stielsen Hotellhem i Stockholm

• Karolina Keyzer, city architect, City of Stockholm

• Per Kra, architect SAR/MSA, ASF-SE

• Jonas Rydberg, socialchef, Stockholms stadsmission

• Henrietta Palmer, architect SAR/MSA, professor Royal

Institute of Art, Stockholm – appointed by Swedish

Association of Architects competition committee.

• Ulrike Schartner, architect MSA, mag. Arch (UAK),

Gaupenraub

• Tove Wallsten Dumon, Swedish Association of Architects,

jury secretary

Competition officer is Joanna Oleksak, architect SAR/MSA, ASF-SE

Commission

There is no guarantee of a commission after the competition is completed, but hopefully interesting and relevant proposals can be developed further with the aim of realization. Both the City of Stockholm and Stockholms stadsmission are interested in finding projects that can become real projects. If so, it shall be the winning proposals’ authors that are commissioned to develop their ideas.

English competition brief:

https://www.arkitekt.se/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Heml%C3%B6s_competition-brief-english.pdf

Competition website: www.arkitekterutangranser.se/hemlos

High Density Housing in the Suburbs?

An Ideas Competition in Berlin Seeks Answers

Winning entry perspective Image: ©AllesWirdGut Architekten

Berlin developer HOWOGE recently staged what was regarded as a “planning Laboratory” competition for a model satellite in northwest Berlin. The brief for this invited competition noted that the urban sprawl, which had accompanied the reunification of Germany(and Berlin) in 1989, was low density in character, occupying wide swaths of suburban areas around the city. With previous high density, and now controversial Berlin projects in mind—the problems with Berlin’s high-density Gropius-Stadt as a warning signal—the sponsor here suggested that lessons learned from past mistakes could be avoided with a high-quality design strategy…

Winner Announced for New Preston Mosque Competition

LUCA POIAN FORMS Image courtesy RIBA

Facilitator: RIBA
Location: Preston, U.K.
Type: International, open
The competition attracted over 200 entries from 40 different countries.
Five finalists were chosen to participate in a second phase:
Winner
• LUCA POIAN FORMS, London, UK
Finalists

BLANKPAGE Architects, Lebanon
Borough Architects + buchhandler-nelli + elca, Cambridge, UK
Mcheileh Studio, New York (Highly Commended by the Evaluation Panel)
TABE SHOURI, New York

RIBA competition website:
www.architecture.com/competitions

Young Architects in Competitions

When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality

by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047

What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset?

This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions.

Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link:

https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/

A Russian City Sets Its Priorities in the Public Realm

Astrakhan Looks to Raise Its Quality of Life Index

Aerial view of downtown Astrakhan

Planning competitions with a strong landscape component take many forms, including some for plazas and gateways to major town centers, city neighborhood sites with multi-story housing units, university campus plans and finally, comprehensive city plans—the latter either being for new towns, as in China, or strategies for the improvement of existing cities—as was here the case with Astrakhan, a major city on the Volga delta, and the Caspian Sea.

Edinburgh’s Ross Pavilion in Danger

Image: ©wHY Architecture

Earlier this year, an article in the Architects’ Journal described what almost sounded like a death knell for wHY Architecture’s winning competition design for Edinburgh’s Ross Pavilion site. When the competition took place, some observers may have regarded wHY as a wild card, in the company of such high-profile firms as BIG and David Adjaye,* There can be no question that they understood the site and program better than their rivals, and it would have appeared that innovation had won the day. Their design could have served to rethink the way in which this site, with its replacement of an outdated bandstand by a contemporary structure, would serve as a destination for Scotland’s public—much as has been the case for Frank Gehry’s pavilion in Chicago’s Millennium Park.

A New Meeting Place for Moscovites

SWA/Balsley Wins Paveletskaya Plaza Landscape Competition

Aerial view at night – courtesy SWA/Balsley 5+ Design

Of the nine railway stations in Moscow, Paveletskaya is the largest and one of the last of those that opened around the turn of the century. Compared to other Moscow stations, Paveletskaya, designed by Alexander Krasovsky and opened in 1900, represented a lower-key presence in its sprawling configuration, similar to palaces such as a Sans Souci without the ornamentation.

The original site for the recent competition included a small park facing the station, bordered on one side by the Ring Road. Post WWII, the site was bifurcated by a road, thus separating the front entrance of the station from the grassy area facing it.

Copyright © 2021 Competitions

All Rights Reserved Competitions-Archive LLC,
1731 Fernwood Avenue, Louisville, Ky 40250 U.S.A

Ph: (502) 451-3623; Fax: (502) 451-3623

Website: https://competitions.org

E: scollyer@competitions.org

Privacy Policy: CP-Privacy-Policy.pdf

IMPORTANT NOTICE : Unless otherwise indicated, photographs of buildings and projects are from professional or institutional archives. All reproduction is prohibited unless authorized by the architects, designers, office managers, consortia or archives centers concerned. The Competitions-Archive LLC is not held responsible for any omissions or inaccuracies, but appreciate all comments and pertinent information that will permit necessary modifications during future updates.

Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa