SHIFTboston Ideas Competition 2009Sponsor: SHIFT and The Boston Society of Architects /AIA Type: Open International Language: English Eligibility: This competition is open to all individuals and teams of all sizes. Registration fee: US$35.00 Awards:
The winning entry will receive a US$1,000.00 cash prize. The winner along with a select number of honorable mentions will be invited to attend the SHIFTboston Forum to present their work to the jury member and invited guests. The Forum will be held at the Institute of Contemporary Art, Boston on January 14, 2010. Honored projects may be featured in publications designed and used as promotional materials for SHIFTboston. It is expected that honored projects will appear on a billboard, bus shelters and subway cars in the Boston Metropolitan area as part of the SHIFTboston Exhibit. All eligible entries will be promoted on the SHIFTboston blog and website. Timetable:
December 11, 2009 – Submissions received no later than 4:00pm EST.
December 2009 – Jury will meet.
January 14, 2010 – SHIFTboston Forum held at The Institute of Contemporary Art, Boston. Jury:
Thom Mayne – Founder and Design Director of Morphosis Architects, Santa Monica, CA
Scott Burnham – Urban Strategist, London, UK
Ana Salinas Mata – Prinicipal of Wilk-Salinas Architekten, Berlin, Germany
Mitchell Joachim, PhD – Co-Founder of Terreform ONE and Terrefuge, New York, NY
Brian Healy, AIA – Principal Brian Healy Architects, Boston, MA
Audrey O’Hagan, AIA – Principal of O’Hagan Architects, Boston, MA
Sarah Whiting, PhD – Principal of WW Architecture, Dean of the Rice University School of Architecture (January 2010)
Design Challenge:
This competition calls on all visionaries to evaluate the current status of Boston’s urban environment and submit their ideal addition or augmentation to the existing context. Help uncover the most pressing issues concerning the future of Boston and respond to them in an imaginative manner. Avoid the stereotype and everything you have seen done before; imagine what deserves to be there! What do cities provide us with? What do you believe Boston should provide? Let your idea take shape and function, and enhance the everyday setting. Make Boston thrive! Topics to explore but not limited to:
Boston – the future
Governing bodies
Human scale
Materials and technology
Energy harvesting
Symbiosis
Ecological urbanism Please be aware that these should be inventive, innovative, visionary proposals. The broader and more diverse the subjects the better. You are not limited by the ideas in this brief. This competition is designed for multiple viewpoints – architect, artist, student, government official, and citizen. This is your opportunity to share your bold urban vision. Submission Requirements:
Entries must be formatted to fit a single 24″ x 36″ (60cm x 90cm) board (landscape orientation). The board may include any drawings and three-dimensional representation of the proposed concept along with any supporting text. Inventive and multi-graphical presentations are encouraged.
For information, please visit: www.shiftboston.org or get inspired at www.shiftboston.blogspot.com. |
Perkins & Will
Carrying the label, “Artistic Ideas Competition,” five firms vied for a commission to design a new National Museum of the U.S. Navy. Household names, the five were
Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG) Copenhagen/ New York
Gehry Partners (Los Angeles)
DLR Group (Columbus, OH)
Perkins&Will (Chicago) Winner!
Quinn Evans (Ann Arbor) With a site not yet identified, it is possible that a final design will look quite different from the present submission. the Navy has expressed a preference for M Street SE and 6th Street SE, near the Navy Yard in Washington, D.C. Young Architects in Competitions When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality 
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset? This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions. Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link: https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/ Six Firms Competed to Rethink the Future of a Major Museum 
Aerial view of winning design ©Nieto Sobejano Arquitectos (courtesy Malcolm Reading Consultants)
The history of the Dallas Museum of Art’s expansion has been punctuated by several moves, culminating in a new building designed by Edward Larrabee Barnes in 1984. The importance of this move to a new, somewhat desolate location in the city cannot be underestimated: it has led to the revitalization of what is now called the “Arts District,” with the relocation of various arts institutions to new facilities: the opera house (Foster and Partners), Dee and Charles Wyly Performing Arts Theater (REX/OMA), Nasher Sculpture Center (Renzo Piano), and I.M. Pei’s Meyerson Symphony Center being among the most significant. Read more… 
Courtesy Malcolm Reading Consultants, ©Kengo Kuma & Associates
A UNESCO World Heritage Site Again on the World Stage How does one approach a challenge when creating a design worthy of a park with a history dating back to antiquity? This was what four design teams faced when shortlisted for the design of a Visitor Center for the Butrint National Park in Albania. The park’s history is illuminating in this regard.
Read more…
Chungji National Heritage Museum Competition
Image ©Ona Architects + Jongjin Lee architects + Laguillo Arquitectos
For those unfamiliar with Korean Heritage and its symbols, the choice of the jury for a new complex to house artifacts, now located at various scattered sites, would seem to beg more information, especially when one views the designs of the non-selected finalists—all quite modern. Some of this can certainly be explained by the subject matter of the new museum’s holdings, another by the site in broader terms. Some might say that emphasis placed on the heritage element in the design brief fostered an interpretation leading to the choice of the winning design: “The site chosen for the new Chungji National Museum is logical: Chungju, located in the central part of the Korean Peninsula, is the center of the so-called ‘Jungwon culture,’ which has played an important role geographically and historically since ancient time. Jungwon culture developed around the Namhan River, which runs through the central region from east to west, and the relics showing this are currently scattered and stored in various museums.”
Read more… University of Florida’s College of Design Construction and Planning’s New Addition 
Development phase image courtesy ©Brooks + Scarpa
If architects have had one complaint concerning the planning and realization of a project, it has been with planners and especially construction managers, both of whom often display a lack of knowledge about architecture. The survival of a well-conceived design can hang in the balance when there is a knowledge gap at the planning and realization end.
Read more…
|
