ResilientCity Design CompetitionSponsor: ResilientCity.org Type: open, international, 1-stage Language: English Eligibility: Architects, urban planners, landscape architects, and engineers, as well as interns and students of these disciplines Registration fee: $20 – students and interns $50 – registered professionals Awards: 1st Prize – $1,000 2nd Prize (Urban Design) – $500 2nd Prize (Building Design) – $500 Timetable: 21 August, 2009 – registration deadline 31 August, 2009 – submission deadline Jury: Craig Applegath, Architect/Urban Designer Antonio Gomez-Palacio, Urban Design Gregory Greene, Film Maker Peter Howard, Environmentalist Lyle Scott, Sustainability Engineering Kelly Doran, Architecture and Urban Design Gordon Graff, Architecture and Urban Food Design Challenge: There are 4 scenarios, 2 for building design, and 2 for urban planning strategies. Each Scenario represents an important opportunity to transform our current urban fabric into post-carbon, zero net energy building and urban fabric. 1. Repurposing and re-skinning of an existing multi-story commercial office building to convert it into a low-carbon, net-zero energy, multi-use building. 2. Design of a low-rise mixed-use urban block development – a complex of buildings that would occupy a typical urban block. 3. Transformation of an existing suburban low-density residential neighborhood into a higher-density, mixed-use, self-sufficient, re-localized neighborhood. 4. Transformation of an existing urban residential neighborhood to make it more resilient and self sufficient in providing its own food supply. Submission Requirements: The entry should include the following information: 1. A confirmation of the scenario to which the design proposal applies. 2. A 300 to 500 word description of a design proposal, including how it exemplifies some or all of the ResilientCity Planning and Design Principles, Urban Design Principles, and/or Building Design Principles, as well as a description of key local climatic, geographic and economic conditions of the city. 3. A brief summary (100 words max) of the above description, including a point-form list of the ResilientCity.org Planning and Design Principles, Urban Design Principles, and/or Building Design Principles incorporated in the project. 4. The name, and district of the city in which a design proposal is being located. 5. At least one 3D perspective drawing of the proposal that best captures the proposed ideas. The image can be a simple idea sketch or a much more detailed 3D rendering. 6. At least one Site Plan drawing that most effectively explains the design ideas. 7. For Building Design Scenarios 1 and 2, at least one building plan drawing that effectively conveys the design ideas. 8. At least one neighborhood or community context plan to help the jury understand the proposal’s context. 9. Any additional text explanations or labels that are appropriate for conveying the design ideas. 10. Any additional drawings, sketches, photographs or illustrations that will help the jury best understand the ideas and intent of the submission. For more information, go to: www.resilientcity.org |
The Makasiiniranta South Harbor Competition
Helsinki South Harbour and Tori Quarter Suomen Ilmakuva Helsinki. Image credit/ Tietoa Finland, Janne Hirvonen
As a prelude to a competition for the design of a new Architecture and Design Museum to be located in Helsinki’s South Harbor, the City of Finland staged an open competition to establish a roadmap for the future redevelopment of the Makasiiniranta harbor area, the last old harbor area to be transformed for public use in Helsinki. The competition for the museum is scheduled to take place later this year; but the entire surrounding area has come up with a plan to review improvements for the entire harbor environment.
Read more… Young Architects in Competitions When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality  by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020 271 illustrations in color and black & white Available in PDF and eBook formats ISBN 9781988962047 What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset? This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions. Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link: https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/ Vltava Philharmonic Hall Design Competition  View to Concert Hall from bridge ©BIG Classical music is still part of a vibrant musical scene in Prague, with at least four principal venues hosting concerts, ballet and opera. As a modern European city, the only missing venue from these choices is a state of the art concert hall. Other European neighbors have also recently staged competitions for such projects: Munich, won by Cukrowicz Nachbaur Architekten of Bregenz, Austria; Belgrade, won by AL_A of London; and Vilnius, Lithuania, won by Arquivio Architects of Spain. It should be noted, however, that one of the most important competitions for a concert hall, not only in Europe, but the world, was the 1961 Berlin Philharmonic hall competition, won by Hans Scharoun (below). It was the interior of that building, in particular, that served as a model for many others that followed, one of the first being Los Angeles’ Disney Hall by Frank Gehry. Read more… Budapest’s Nyugati Rail Station Competition  Image courtesy Budapest Development Agency ©Grimshaw Completed in 1877, Budapest’s Nyugati Railway Station has witnessed many of the twists and turns of Hungarian history: the Austro-Hungarian Empire, revolutions of post-World War I and 1956, and various shades of expansion and shrinkage in their territory. Its important location in Europe’s history as a contested land in southeastern Europe has not only served as a path for armies of conquest, but as a matter of great interest for major powers. Amid all the changes it has experienced, Hungary, and Budapest in particular, has retained a fascination for outsiders, making it one of Europe’s high profile tourist attractions. Read more… A Quest for that Elusive Connective Formula  First Place: Pedestrian perspective from Parliament – Zeidler Architecture in association with David Chipperfield Architects How do you find a common thread that can connect an eclectic collection of buildings, visually as well as physically, all located within a one-block site, located just across from Canada’s Parliament building in Ottawa. To identify this common thread that could tie everything together, the client turned to a design competition for answers. With the aid of consultants, [phase eins] from Berlin and experts from Canada’s’ own Université de Montréal’s School of Architecture, the client turned to an invited international format to finally settle on six teams that could rethink the site. Read more… Vilnius Railway Station and Public Square Competition  Vilnius Station competition Image: ©Zaha Hadid Architects In European cities, recent history has seen their central railway stations become the subject of upgrades, or totally new projects, many of them springing up in Eastern Europe. In most cases, the focus on this phenomena occurred several decades after earth-shaking political events. In Germany it was the construction of a new main central station (Hauptbahnhof) shortly after the reunification of Germany and Berlin. in Estonia, and now Lithuania, it has occurred after the independence of those countries in conjunction with the dissolution of the Soviet Union. And in Hungary, it was the subject of a recent competition encompassing a large area surrounding the station. Read More… |