Facilitator: Project Seoul Type: International, open, one-stage Location: Seoul, Korea Fees: none Languages: Korean and English Timetable: 18 March 2022 – Registration deadline 18 February 2022 – Q&A deadline 7 April 2022 – Submission deadline 19 April 2022 – Winners announcement Jury • Hyun Seo, Seoul National University • Hokeun Oh, Design Camp Moonpark
Read more…
Competition Site Plan, Courtesy Amt für Stadtplanung Stuttgart
Sponsors: City of Stuttgart, Germany and the State of Baden Württemberg
Event: International Building Exhibition ‘27 Timetable: 14 January 2022 – Competition launch 11 February 2022 – Registration deadline 20-21 June – Jury convenes Design Challenge: After a century of architectural and urban history,
Read more…
Rendering courtesy of OBO, by the Miller Hull Partnership
The U.S. Department of State, Overseas Buildings Operation (OBO), is requesting submissions to prequalify firms for Design-Build Construction Services for the construction of a new U.S. Embassy and staff Housing in Juba, South Sudan. OBO seeks to commission our nation’s top constructors to produce
Read more…
Organizer : Korea Trade Investment Promotion Agency, World Expo Team
Theme: “Designing Future Society for Our Lives”
Venue : Osaka Yumeshima Expo Site(155.6 ha) Type: International, open, 2-Stage Competition
Fee: none
Stage 1 : Team Building & Idea Proposal / Select 3 Teams for Stage 2 Screening Stage 2 : Master Plan Proposal /
Read more…
Competition facilitator: RIBA Location: Berwick, U.K. Type: Invited, EOI Process: The shortlisting process will select up to five teams to compete in the competition phase Timetable: 24 January 2022 – Deadline for submissions of EOI Budget: Est £14m to include design, build and internal/technical fit out to agreed specification. Compensation Each team invited to
Read more…
Sponsor: London School of Economics (LSE) Facilitator: RIBA Type: Invited with 2nd stage competition with up to six participants Location: 35 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, U.K. Timetable: 21 January 2022 – Deadline for EOI document submissions 7 February 2022 – Jury panel selection of shortlist Project Aims
A new building that will play
Read more…
Sponsor: U.S. Department of State, Overseas Building Operations (OBO) Type: Design Build + Architecture Process: Pre-qualification Timetable: 20 January 2022 – Documents submission deadline Additional submission requirements: Bidders must possess or be able to obtain a Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) Secret facility security clearance (FCL) with Secret safeguarding capability. Competition website: https://sam.gov/opp/13a208da2a164e84a859ab446ca86a27/view
Read more…
Reinventing the Mikrorayon: The Circular Block Competition
Sponsor: Tallinn Architecture Biennale (TAB) Location: Tallinn, Estonia Type: open, international, ideas Language: English Fee: none Eligibility: Estonian and foreign architects, students Timetable: 1 December 2021 – Questions deadline 28 February 2022 – Digital submissions due May 2022 – Winners announced Awards: 1st Prize –
Read more…
What might Australian cities look like by 2100?
Organizers: PIA Planning Institute Australia and AUDRC Australian Urban Design Research Centre
Type: Open, international, student
Language: English
Eligibility: The competition is open to tertiary students currently enrolled in an undergraduate or postgraduate program at an Australian (or international) university or technical college, and recent
Read more…
Image courtesy of thebentway.ca
The Bentway has announced the six shortlisted teams for the Waterfront ReConnect design competition, a collaboration with the City of Toronto, the Waterfront Business Improvement Area, and the Toronto Downtown West Business Improvement Area.
“Toronto’s Gardiner Expressway cuts across the full length of the city, acting as both
Read more…
|
Helsinki Central Library, by ALA Architects (2012-2018)
The world has experienced a limited number of open competitions over the past three decades, but even with diminishing numbers, some stand out among projects in their categories that can’t be ignored for the high quality and degree of creativity they revealed. Included among those are several invited competitions that were extraordinary in their efforts to explore new avenues of institutional and museum design. Some might ask why the Vietnam Memorial is not mentioned here. Only included in our list are competitions that were covered by us, beginning in 1990 with COMPETITIONS magazine to the present day. As for what category a project under construction (Science Island), might belong to or fundraising still in progress (San Jose’s Urban Confluence or the Cold War Memorial competition, Wisconsin), we would classify the former as “built” and wait and see what happens with the latter—keeping our fingers crossed for a positive outcome.
Read More…
Young Architects in Competitions
When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset?
This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions.
Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link:
https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/
RUR model perspective – ©RUR
New Kaohsiung Port and Cruise Terminal, Taiwan (2011-2020)
Reiser+Umemoto RUR Architecture PC/ Jesse Reiser – U.S.A.
with
Fei & Cheng Associates/Philip T.C. Fei –R.O.C. (Tendener)
This was probably the last international open competition result that was built in Taiwan. A later competition for the Keelung Harbor Service Building Competition, won by Neil Denari of the U.S., the result of a shortlisting procedure, was not built. The fact that the project by RUR was eventually completed—the result of the RUR/Fei & Cheng’s winning entry there—certainly goes back to the collaborative role of those to firms in winning the 2008 Taipei Pop Music Center competition, a collaboration that should not be underestimated in setting the stage for this competition.
Read more…
Winning entry ©Herzog de Meuron
In visiting any museum, one might wonder what important works of art are out of view in storage, possibly not considered high profile enough to see the light of day? In Korea, an answer to this question is in the making.
It can come as no surprise that museums are running out of storage space. This is not just the case with long established “western” museums, but elsewhere throughout the world as well. In Seoul, South Korea, such an issue has been addressed by planning for a new kind of storage facility, the Seouipul Open Storage Museum. The new institution will house artworks and artifacts of three major museums in Seoul: the Seoul Museum of Modern Art, the Seoul Museum of History, and the Seoul Museum of Craft Art.
Read more…
Belfast Looks Toward an Equitable and Sustainable Housing Model
Birdseye view of Mackie site ©Matthew Lloyd Architects
If one were to look for a theme that is common to most affordable housing models, public access has been based primarily on income, or to be more precise, the very lack of it. Here it is no different, with Belfast’s homeless problem posing a major concern. But the competition also hopes to address another of Belfast’s decades-long issues—its religious divide. There is an underlying assumption here that religion will play no part in a selection process. The competition’s local sponsor was “Take Back the City,” its membership consisting mainly of social advocates. In setting priorities for the housing model, the group interviewed potential future dwellers as well as stakeholders to determine the nature of this model. Among those actions taken was the “photo- mapping of available land in Belfast, which could be used to tackle the housing crisis. Since 2020, (the group) hosted seminars that brought together international experts and homeless people with the goal of finding solutions. Surveys and workshops involving local people, housing associations and council duty-bearers have explored the potential of the Mackie’s site.” This research was the basis for the competition launched in 2022.
Read more…
Winning Stage 2 design for the WWll Memorial Competition ©Friedrich St. Florian
The guidelines for the administration a design competition are not a closely held state secret. Still, leading up to the announcement of a design competition for the World War II Memorial, some in the military seemed to think otherwise. In early 1993, an AIA staff person, Frimmel Smith, was appointed to serve as a source of information on the subject. Shortly after President Clinton signed a bill in 1993 authorizing the establishment of a memorial, several military officers appeared in Frimmel Smith’s office at the AIA headquarters, announcing they would like to learn about competitions. Were they asleep during the exemplary administration of the Vietnam Memorial competition, which had resulted in an highly acclaimed product? Or, with another war memorial in the offing, did they not want to be caught off guard this time and again be bystanders as was the case when an enlisted man, Jan Scruggs, was the initiator of the Vietnam Memorial?
Read more…
|
