High Density in a Green Environment
Geneva Suburban Project as Urban Housing Model
©Bauen+Wohnen
An article, Trois tourettes et un jardin (Three Turrets and a Garden) by Swiss landscape architect, Valérie Hoffmeyer, in Werk, Bauen + Wohnen, is another recent example highlighting the value of green space in the design of mid-rise residential buildings. At a time when developers endeavor to maximize their profits by turning to highrise buildings, even when higher density is at stake, referencing the Garden City concept has been turning up as a more frequent theme.1
Approach from street
In this particular development— the result of a competition in the la Gradelle Quarter, a suburb of Geneva, Switzerland—a modest parcel has been the beneficiary of an innovative green solution, also high density by design. Designed by the Geneva architecture office, Lin.Robbe.Seiler, a central green area is surrounded by three highrises, providing residents with options one normally would not encounter in such developments. Instead of having to walk several blocks to reach a park-like setting, they can find it at their own doorstep. Both the visual as well as physical advantages to be gained here are self-evident.
Article author Hoffmeyer sums up the approach to the design of this project as envisioned by the developer:
“The client wanted a project inspired by garden cities, while developing a certain density.” Summed up in this way by architect Rolf Seiler, of the Geneva office, Lin.Robbe.Seiler, “the framework of the ‘Jardins de la Gradelle’ project (2020) seems as idyllic as that of the plot of land it is to be built on: a clear vision of a plot of land with great potential, both for landscaping and for building in this very affluent community of Cologny (GE). Located in a development zone where the construction of 21-meter high buildings is allowed, and occupied until then by tennis courts and bordered by large trees, this parcel suffered from few constraints at the time of the private architectural competition, which was launched by the owner. In this context, rare in Geneva, Rolf Seiler adds this: “the quality of the project owner, a factor at least as decisive as those mentioned above—‘An open-minded man, eager to pass on a quality heritage to his family, who makes decisions without systematically prioritizing the question of yield, is an immense opportunity—for the architects, but especially for the project.’”2
View to project from street
Architecture
In referring to the choices made in terms of architectural expression and scale by the architects, these factors all had to be addressed in the most sensitive manner, including the neighborhood context. Under normal circumstances, the architecture of the buildings would have been limited by local zoning; but by virtue of a competition process, a certain amount of flexibility was allowed. According to Rolf Seiler, “We did not have to conform to a localized neighborhood plan that would have predefined an urban form, as the competition could replace it in this case.3 This gave us greater freedom, which directed us towards these three towers that are economical in terms of soil and whose plan allows for interesting typologies. Above all, we are sensitive to the question of housing and pay particular attention to the search for new ways of living that are pleasant to live in. It is, for example, this spirit that motivated us to shift the slabs of the balconies, which strongly contribute to the architectural identity of the three towers. But beyond the exterior shape, this gesture first of all allowed us to offer larger openings of the apartments to the outside.”
Staggered floor plates
Thus, the buildings ended up with multiple angles, rather than the conventional four sides, with the floor plates staggered so as to prevent any sense of monotony to the casual outside observer. Moreover, the floor plans of the buildings are so arranged allowing residents optimal views to nature. Finally, the height of the buildings was important: their relationship to the “garden” was such that they were not overwhelming, as is often the case with skyscrapers. Also, by their siting, a comfortable central focus framing the garden was created. Here was a case where one has an impression that these structures serve as an integral element of this park-like setting.3
For a successful project such as this, all the necessary ingredients were present: a client who saw advantages in adding more green space into the mix and the willingness to stage a design competition to realize these goals; the choice by the jury of a design that understood the site’s challenges and was able to produce a concept that could not only accommodate the dreams of its future residents, but also earn the tag, “good neighbor.” -Ed
Footnotes
1 Werk, Bauen+Wohnen 1/2/2022
2 Valérie Hoffmeyer interview, in Werk, Bauen + Wohnen,1/2/2022
3 Rolf Seiler mentioned that most of their firm’s work has been the result of competitions
4 In many ways, this project, on a much smaller scale, is similar in approach to Berlin’s 1957-61 Hansa Viertel social housing project, where the building heights were limited with a generous portion of green space.
Firm principals Alain Robbe (far left) and Rolf Seiler (far right)
Unless otherwise noted, all images ©Lin.Robbe.Seiler
|
Completed IMEX by Tuck Hinton Architects. Photo courtesy Anecdote It is not often that we look back to a competition that occurred three decades ago that was also covered in detail by COMPETITIONS (Vol. 4, #4; pp. 14-27). What made the Chattanooga IMAX different back in 1994 was that the article covering that competition was authored by Prof. Marleen Davis, then Dean of the University of Tennessee’s School of Architecture and a member of the jury panel. This was not just a short article, covering the high points of the competition with a few talking points about the winning design. This 4,000+ word document also described in detail the jury’s observations about all the finalists, including the honorable mentions—one of the few times we have gained such a detailed glimpse in this country from the inside of the competition process. Read more… Preparation and Organization of Design Competitions [phase 1] Benjamin Hossbach / Christian Lehmhaus / Christine Eichelmann 210 × 230 mm, 192 pp. over 600 images softcover ISBN 978-3-86922-316-2 (English) ISBN 978-3-86922-240-0 (German) Dom Publishers €48 in EU (For price abroad, see below) Founded in 1998 in Berlin, Phase 1 has been a principal player in the organization and facilitation of design competitions, not only in Germany, but abroad as well. The accomplishments of the firm have been well documented in three volumes—The Architecture of Competitions—beginning in 2i006. Whereas these books mainly focused on the results of the competitions they have administered, the present work, Fundamentals of Competition Management, takes one from the very beginnings of the competition process to its conclusion. The authors envisioned the publication as “three three books in one: one „blue book“ with example projects, one „yellow book“ with statements and the „white book“ with the actual guideline to competition management.” Although there have been a number of handbooks covering the administration of designcompetitions a study covering the entire process in such detail is a welcome addition to the the literature in this field. As a contribution to this important democratic process that has yielded exceptional design for decades, this volume is not only valid for Europe, but a current overview of the process for those globally who wish to raise the level of design by virtue of a design competition. -Ed Foreign institutions wishing to obtain a copy of the book will recieve a discount to cover the cost of foreign shipping. To obtain a copy for that offer, go to: [email protected] Winning entry by Luca Poian Forms Image ©Filippo Bolognese images Good design seldom happens in a vacuum. And so it was with an international competition for a new mosque in Preston, U.K. A mid-sized city of 95,000, and located in Lancashire near the west coast and almost equally distant from London and Glasgow, Preston has a storied past, going all the way back to the Romans and the late Middle Ages, where it was the site of significant battles. During the Industrial Revolution, the city prospered, and it was not until after World War II that Preston experienced the British version of the U.S. Rust Belt. In the meantime, the city has experienced an upswing in economic activity, with an unemployment rate of only 3%. Aside from the appearance of new industries, the city has benefitted from the establishment of Central Lancashire University (CLU), which employs over 3,000 faculty and staff, and, as such, is one of the regions major employers. Any new university requires new facilities, and one of the most outstanding examples of this at CLU was the new Student Centre and Plaza, a result of a 2016 RIBA-sponsored competition won by Hawkins/Brown Read More
Changdong Station winner – image ©D & B Partners Architects
Whereas international competitions for real projects have become a rarity lately, Korea is a welcome exception. Among the plethora of competition announcements we receive almost weekly, several have ended with foreign firms as winners. But the history of welcoming international participants does go back several years. One notable early example was the Incheon Airport competition, won by Fentress Bradburn Architects (1962-70).
Among the more recent successes of foreign firms was the Busan Opera House competition, won by Snøhetta (2013-) and the Sejong Museum Gardens competition, won by Office OU, Toronto (2016-2023).
Read more… 1st Place: Zaha Hadid Architects – night view from river – Render by Negativ Arriving to board a ferry boat or cruise ship used to be a rather mundane experience. If you had luggage, you might be able to drop it off upon boarding, assuming that the boarding operation was sophisticated enough. In any case, the arrival experience was nothing to look forward to. I recall boarding the SS United States for a trip to Europe in the late 1950s. Arriving at the pier in New York, the only thought any traveler had was to board that ocean liner as soon as possible, find one’s cabin, and start exploring. If you were in New York City and arriving early, a nearby restaurant or cafe would be your best bet while passing time before boarding. Read more… Helsinki Central Library, by ALA Architects (2012-2018) The world has experienced a limited number of open competitions over the past three decades, but even with diminishing numbers, some stand out among projects in their categories that can’t be ignored for the high quality and degree of creativity they revealed. Included among those are several invited competitions that were extraordinary in their efforts to explore new avenues of institutional and museum design. Some might ask why the Vietnam Memorial is not mentioned here. Only included in our list are competitions that were covered by us, beginning in 1990 with COMPETITIONS magazine to the present day. As for what category a project under construction (Science Island), might belong to or fundraising still in progress (San Jose’s Urban Confluence or the Cold War Memorial competition, Wisconsin), we would classify the former as “built” and wait and see what happens with the latter—keeping our fingers crossed for a positive outcome. Read More… 2023 Teaching and Innovation Farm Lab Graduate Student Honor Award by USC (aerial view) Architecture at Zero competitions, which focus on the theme, Design Competition for Decarbonization, Equity and Resilience in California, have been supported by numerous California utilities such as Southern California Edison, PG&E, SoCAl Gas, etc., who have recognized the need for better climate solutions in that state as well as globally. Until recently, most of these competitions were based on an ideas only format, with few expectations that any of the winning designs would actually be realized. The anticipated realization of the 2022 and 2023 competitions suggests that some clients are taking these ideas seriously enough to go ahead with realization. Read more… |