Architecture and Urbanism Beyond COVID 19 Open Call for Collaborative Research & Proposal Organizers: Korean Institute of Architects
Type: International, open, ideas
Languages: Korean and English
Fees: None
Timetable:
30 September 2020 – Key Concepts Submissions
13 October 2020 – Research and Proposals (5 teams)
30 November 2020 – Final submissions
Awards: total available 50M KRW($42,000)
Process:
This Open Call is operated in process-type. In the time of COVID-19, we aim to establish a global open platform where professionals, researchers and interested citizens connect, communicate and together reflect on their respective architectural and urban crises. In addition, to draw the topography of the crisis of the living environment and new challenges in cooperation and alliance through the open platform. This cooperation and alliance’s platform is called What is To be Asked platform (WTA platform).
– WTA platform is open for everyone. All platform participants to submit questions, related architectural/ city observation image, #keyword related to COVID19 situation in their resident city.
– Participants who respond to [Research & Proposal] in the Open Call, other participants or interested citizens can communicate by information sharing, discussion on topics and cooperative networking, and through these actions to develop and submit [Key Concepts].
– The selected [Key Concepts] individuals or teams will be assigned to individual discussion board and to communicate with various participants on the platform and publish their result by developing the topic in [Research & Proposal]. Through participation registration on Open Call entitles participation on WTA platform, adding of new team member or team formation among participants is feasible before [Key Concepts] submission deadline. We encourage active collaboration between different fields to respond to this complex crisis of architecture and city caused by COVID19. For more information:
https://beyondcovid19-opencall.org/main |
Image Courtesy Network Rail
From Grand Central Station to King’s Cross in London, railway stations have often represented some of the major architectural accomplishments of our times. But those edifices have been primarily located in great cities. In the U.K. there are over 2,000 stations located in medium-sized, small, and rural communities. Most of those are ‘quick stop’ locations, and not the destination terminals where space requirements often result in state of the art design. In July of last year, U.K.’s Network Rail, in collaboration with the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) launched a competition to identify a concept for a design that would be suitable for the medium to small-sized rail stations, at the same time updating the program to fit the modern needs of such a facility. The competition was open internationally and received 213 entries from 34 countries last September. Read more… Young Architects in Competitions When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset? This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions. Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link: https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/ The Urban Confluence Silicon Valley Competition
Urban Confluence Silicon Valley winner: ©SMAR Architecture Studio
After several stops and starts over an extended period of time, the winner of the Urban Confluence Design Competition was named in early March, 2021. SMAR Architecture Studio’s The Breeze of Innovation, which prevailed over two other shortlisted finalists from the original 963 entries, won with a novel tower-like structure consisting primarily of hundreds of rods, generating energy while swaying in the wind. Read More…
Pedestrian perspective
The result of an effort from a professor at the TUM (Technische Universität München) to restore the Budludzha Monument in Bulgaria, located in a remote location on a mountain top in that country, we discovered that it originally was the result of a 1959 design competition won by the young Bulgarian architect, Georgi Stoilov. Read more… A Flawed Plan Leads to Budget Issues
Competition rendering of project looking south to Mies museum ©Herzog de Meuron
Once considered on the forefront of modern architecture in post-WWII Europe, Berlin has had its share of questionable decisions concerning important urban projects in recent history. Beginning with the rebirth of the Berlin Palace (Humboldt Forum) on the Spree by Italian architect, Franco Stella, and now followed by Herzog de Meuron’s controversial addition to Mies’s 20th Century Art Museum, the times when one could look to Berlin as a signpost of architectural innovation can only be viewed in the rear view mirror.
Read more… |
