Gwangju City Main Library Competition 
Sponsor: City of Gwangju, UIA
Type: International, open, anonymous
Fee: None
Languages: English, Korean
Timetable:
11 December 2019 – Registration deadline!
7 February 2020 – Submission deadline
12 February 2020 – Jury session
Awards:
1st Prize- Design Development and Construction Document Priority right (with approx. KRW 17.3 billion for the design)
2nd Prize- KRW 50 million (US$42,000)
3rd Prize- KRW 2.5 million (each for 2 winners)
Jurors:
1. Thomas Vonier, Architect (UIA, President)
2. Robert Greenwood (Snohetta, Norway
3. Min, Hyun Sik (Kiohun Architects, Korea)
4. Kim, Sung Hong(University of Seoul, Korea)
5.Choi, Moon-Gyu (Yonsei University, Korea)
6. Oh, Se Gyu (Chonnam National University, Korea)
7.Choi, Kyung Yang(Hansem Architects Group, Korea)
Deputy Juror
8. Chung, Hyun A(DIA Architecture, Korea)
Design Challenge: Gwangju’s New Milestone This project is a milestone-making task planned by Gwangju in order to move into a new era. Therefore, it aims to embrace future-oriented values such as from ‘development’ to ‘regeneration’, from ‘device’ to ‘knowledge’, and from ‘efficiency and administrative priority’ to ‘culture and participation priority’ that are pursued by Gwangju. We expect the plan to capture this value, both symbolically and practically. A Place of Social and Urban Solidarity The plan should carefully examine various conditions around the site to derive the value and potential of the site to come up with a specific city order. In addition, a reasonable setting and linkage between public facilities and public places should be considered by referring to social and urban contexts. It is hoped that this place will become a place of solidarity and communication for members of society.
The Site Public Library and Residents’ Sports Facilities In the first stage site area of 10,200m2 out of 31,871m², a total ground area of 11,000m², the public library and residents’ sports facilities will be built. Incineration Site The library site is located in a garbage incineration site in the Sangmu district that was closed in 2016. The remaining incineration plant will be rebuilt as a complex cultural facility after remodeling. For more information, and to register:
www.gjlibrary-compe.org |
Image: ©wHY Architecture
Earlier this year, an article in the Architects’ Journal described what almost sounded like a death knell for wHY Architecture’s winning competition design for Edinburgh’s Ross Pavilion site. When the competition took place, some observers may have regarded wHY as a wild card, in the company of such high-profile firms as BIG and David Adjaye,* There can be no question that they understood the site and program better than their rivals, and it would have appeared that innovation had won the day. Their design could have served to rethink the way in which this site, with its replacement of an outdated bandstand by a contemporary structure, would serve as a destination for Scotland’s public—much as has been the case for Frank Gehry’s pavilion in Chicago’s Millennium Park. Read more… Young Architects in Competitions When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset? This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions. Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link: https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/ The Urban Confluence Silicon Valley Competition
Urban Confluence Silicon Valley winner: ©SMAR Architecture Studio
After several stops and starts over an extended period of time, the winner of the Urban Confluence Design Competition was named in early March, 2021. SMAR Architecture Studio’s The Breeze of Innovation, which prevailed over two other shortlisted finalists from the original 963 entries, won with a novel tower-like structure consisting primarily of hundreds of rods, generating energy while swaying in the wind. Read More… SWA/Balsley Wins Paveletskaya Plaza Landscape Competition
Aerial view at night – courtesy SWA/Balsley 5+ Design
Of the nine railway stations in Moscow, Paveletskaya is the largest and one of the last of those that opened around the turn of the century. Compared to other Moscow stations, Paveletskaya, designed by Alexander Krasovsky and opened in 1900, represented a lower-key presence in its sprawling configuration, similar to palaces such as a Sans Souci without the ornamentation. The original site for the recent competition included a small park facing the station, bordered on one side by the Ring Road. Post WWII, the site was bifurcated by a road, thus separating the front entrance of the station from the grassy area facing it. Read more…
Aerial View of site, Rendering: ©Eller + Eller Architekten
Siemens new Healthineers campus in Bengaluru, India, is hardly a milestone in the design of major R&D facilities. Although the winning design by Eller + Eller Architekten did include the necessity to go higher than the 2- to 4-story models we often find, whether in Silicon Valley, Detroit, or in Munich, the relatively small site for such a large program did ask for that campus feel, asking the competitors to focus on the interdisciplinary factor as well as sustainability and cost. Read more…
Image Courtesy Network Rail
From Grand Central Station to King’s Cross in London, railway stations have often represented some of the major architectural accomplishments of our times. But those edifices have been primarily located in great cities. In the U.K. there are over 2,000 stations located in medium-sized, small, and rural communities. Most of those are ‘quick stop’ locations, and not the destination terminals where space requirements often result in state of the art design. In July of last year, U.K.’s Network Rail, in collaboration with the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) launched a competition to identify a concept for a design that would be suitable for the medium to small-sized rail stations, at the same time updating the program to fit the modern needs of such a facility. The competition was open internationally and received 213 entries from 34 countries last September. Read more… |
