Taoyuan Museum of Arts, Taiwan Note: Tender schedule now available!
Sponsor: Taoyuan City Government
Type: open, international, two-stage
Fee: none
Languages: English and common Chinese
Timetable:
14 December 2017 – Deadline for receipt of tenders
Overview
In view of the fact that the existing Taoyuan arts and cultural facilities are mainly for performing arts activities and for small exhibition events. which are inadequate for displaying visual arts and large arts exhibition, and that there is no dedicated institution to coordinate arts events and store professional art works, Taoyuan city government realizes that an international Art Museum is needed for encouraging local and international arts exchange activities and serve as a platform for the improvement of knowledge of the visual arts.
Site
Taoyuan Museum of Art (TMoA) will be situated in park 12 and park 13 area in Taiwan High Speed Rail (THSR) Taoyuan Staion Zone, adjacent to Taoyuan International Airport MRT A19 station. The museum shall integrate Taoyuan’s local cultural characteristics and the unique landscape featuring numerous ponds in the area. It is anticipated that the exterior of the museum should recognize local art works in appearance. The goal of the Taoyuan Museum of Art is to collect and exhibit local art works and to combine digital multimedia to form an arts learning complex to supplement the education of visual arts in Taiwan
l Total site area: 9.86 ha (98,600 m²)
l Estimated floor area: approx. 33,930 m².
l Construction budget: approx. NTD 2,375,000,000
l Design and Supervision Service Fees: Budget amount of this procurement: NTD 237,500,000 (US$7,867,104 = Service Fee for this procurement is calculated with a fixed percentage of 6% of the total construction cost) Competition Method and Honoraria
Adopting open bid and two-step process
First Place: Service contract signing.
Second Place: NT$2,500,000 (approx. US$83,000)
Third Place: NT$1,500,000 (approx. US$50,000)
Fourth and Fifth Places: NT$1,000,000 (approx. US$33,000)
Sixth prizes: NT$200,000
Contact Personal:
|Transcend Engineering Consultants Co., Ltd. Ms. Jasmine Lin
Tel: +886 2 28265836
Fax: +886 2 28265837
Email: jasmine@pro2009.com
Address for obtaining tender document:
7F.,No.1,Xianfu Rd.,Taoyuan Dist., Taoyuan City 33001, Taiwan
Link to tender document:
http://tmoa.com.tw/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/招標公告英.pdf |
The Urban Confluence Silicon Valley Competition 
Image ©SMAR Architecture
After several stops and starts, a decision to name the winner of the Urban Confluence Design Competition appears to be nearing its conclusion. In 2017, three founders of a local non-profit established The San Jose Light Tower Corporation (SJLTC). The founders of the non-profit, Restauranteur Steve Borkenhagen, construction company executive, Jon Ball and filmmaker Thomas Wohlmut, saw its primary mission in designing and building a new tower as a San Jose and Silicon Valley landmark. This idea was based on the memory of the original San Jose Electric Light Tower (1881-1915), a 22-story structure, located in downtown San Jose and came down as the victim of a gale, never to be rebuilt. Read more… Young Architects in Competitions When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset? This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions. Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link: https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/
Aerial view of site – Courtesy National Finnish Museum
When major cultural institutions in Finland plan a new building project, one can almost always assume that an open competition will be the vehicle by which the client settles on the building’s design. The only question is, will this be organized in a format open to local, Scandinavian, or international architects. In the case of the National Museum of Finland annex competition, it was open to architects throughout the world — resulting in 185 entries. Read more…
The Opening of Taichung’s Central Park by Catherine Mosbach/Philippe Rahm
View from the south with downtown Taichung in the distance image: ©Mosbach/Rahm
The abandonment and closing of airports, including decommissioning those that were used for military purposes, has presented design communities with several opportunities to convert them entirely to civilian purposes. Notable among those which have been the result of competitions are Orange County Great Park, Irvine, California (Ken Smith Landscape Architects), The Estonian National Museum (Dan Dorell, Lina Ghotmeh and Tsuyoshi Tane), and Toronto’s less successful Downsview Park competition, whereby the winning design by OMA, with trees as the primary feature, has been basically ignored. Instead, the area has become the site of numerous commercial and residential projects.
Read more…
SMAR’s Winning Entry Gets the Green Light
Image: ©SMAR Architecture
The winning competition entry in the 2016 Science Island competition in Kaunas, Lithuania by SMAR Architects may only take five years to realize—from the date of the competition to completion. This is encouraging news, as the duration of such projects resulting from a competition can often take much longer—sometimes up to 8-10 years. Read more…
Night view of the memorial tapestry from Independence Avenue, with Gehry’s sketch of the Normandy cliffs.
Explaining the contributions of a World War II hero and later President of the United States on a very modest site on Independence Avenue just off the Washington Mall is tantamount to asking an author to describe the life of this person in no more than one paragraph. But on September 17th, after a long and bumpy journey, lasting almost 20 years and navigating a warren of the DC approval processes and public scrutiny, the Eisenhower Memorial finally was dedicated and opened to the public. Designed by Frank Gehry, it has received mixed reviews, the majority being more positive. But most have pointed out that the memorial is more impressive at night than in full daylight. This is due primarily to the illumination of an almost block-long metallic tapestry—featuring a sketch by Gehry, which depicts his interpretation of the cliffs of the Normandy coastline where the Americans landed on D-Day. Read more… |
