Ideas Competition: Offices of the Fundación Arquitectura Contemporánea and the San Pablo Block in Cordoba.Sponsors: Fundación Arquitectura Contemporánea Type: International ideas, 2-phase Language: Spanish, English Awards: The Jury shall choose the competition winner from among the Phase II finalists. The Fundación Arquitectura Contemporánea shall commission the winning architect or team to draw up the basic design and execution project for the headquarters at the time when the Fundación decides to execute the project. Timeline:
27 November 2009 – Submission of questions
11 December 2009 – Answers to questions
1 February 2010 – Submission deadline
26 February 2010 – Jury’s decision Jury: The jury, which will act in both phases of the competition, shall be made up of the following members: – Chairman; the Chairman of the Fundación Arquitectura Contemporánea.
– Three architects Trustees of the Fundación Arquitectura Contemporánea.
– Three architects of recognized prestige chosen by the Fundación.
– One architect of recognized prestige appointed by the Colegio Oficial de Arquitectos de Cordoba (Official Association of Architects, Cordoba).
– One architect chosen by the entrants.
– The Mayor of Cordoba
– The Director-General of Heritage of the Andalusian Regional Government.
– The Secretary of Culture of the Andalusian Regional Government.
– An expert of recognized prestige in Cultural Management.
– Secretary: the Competition secretary. The secretary shall have voice but no vote.
Design Challenge: The Fundación Arquitectura Contemporánea is holding a Competition for Ideas for the construction of its future head offices on the site located at Calle Capitulares nºs 2 and 4 in the San Pablo block in Cordoba. The new building is envisaged as a public forum for interaction, debate, exhibitions and for the promotion of architecture. It will also constitute a public platform from which the cultural debate pertaining to Contemporary Architecture can be broadened and intensified, through the Fundación’s activities and their projection into public space. This expansive quality of the proposal, which may have different states of use or activities, permanent or ephemeral, as the present and future needs of the Foundation, requires the response to the imperfections of the urban environment of the San Pablo block, where they are located other institutions related to culture, such as the Department of Culture of City Hall, the Chapter House and the Office of Culture of the Andalusian. The definitive conversion of the interior of the Huerta into a public space actively accessible by citizens involves respecting its relationship with the archaeological remains on the site, integrating the Huerta as a key space in the centre of the city and addressing the transit routes accessing the different public cultural institutions located there, especially the Provincial Office of the Culture Department of the Andalusian Regional Government. Submission Requirements:
PHASE I
Graphic documentation:
– A maximum of THREE DIN A1 FORMAT HORIZONTAL PANELS shall be submitted; strong, flat, light and rigid.
– DIN A3 format, which content shall coincide exactly with the information contained in the panels.
– A CD shall be submitted containing an editable PDF files with a minimum resolution of 300 dpi of each of the panels in their original size (A1) and in reduced size (A3) JPG files with a minimum resolution of 150 dpi. For more information, go to: http://www.arquitecturacontemporanea.org/concursoeng/ |
A Church Ruin as Reconciliation Memorial 
View of winning design from south ©Heninghan Peng Architects
For those tourists visiting Berlin today, the sudden approach to the ruins of a 1895 church building located on the city’s downtown Breitscheidplatz would certainly arouse their curiosity. One of the few remaining relics of World War II in the city, the church has now been the subject of a competition: Redesign and renovation of the Old Tower of the Friedrich Wilhelm Memorial Church (Umgestaltung des Alten Turms der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gedächnis-Kirche). Read more… Young Architects in Competitions When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality 
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset? This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions. Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link: https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/ Architecture as a Unifying Concept 
1st Place – UNStudio Image: ©Aerial image: ©die developer Projektentwicklung GmbH
As attractive as some of our most famous towers might appear, they do have a serious downside according to some observers: ‘they suck the life out of the street.’ This has not gone unnoticed, as some cities have required setbacks as partial solutions. Two Mies Van Der Rohe projects, New York’s Seagram Building and the Toronto-Dominion Centre are prime examples of this concept. More recently the recognition that landscaping can provide some breathing space has become quite the fashion. Competitions are now replete with competitors who insist that the surrounding green environment does not stop at the front door. One of the most obvious in recent history is Elizabeth de Portzamparc’s competition winning entry for the Taichung Tower 2 competition in Taiwan. Read more… Belfast Looks Toward an Equitable and Sustainable Housing Model 
Birdseye view of Mackie site ©Matthew Lloyd Architects
If one were to look for a theme that is common to most affordable housing models, public access has been based primarily on income, or to be more precise, the very lack of it. Here it is no different, with Belfast’s homeless problem posing a major concern. But the competition also hopes to address another of Belfast’s decades-long issues—its religious divide. There is an underlying assumption here that religion will play no part in a selection process. The competition’s local sponsor was “Take Back the City,” its membership consisting mainly of social advocates. In setting priorities for the housing model, the group interviewed potential future dwellers as well as stakeholders to determine the nature of this model. Among those actions taken was the “photo- mapping of available land in Belfast, which could be used to tackle the housing crisis. Since 2020, (the group) hosted seminars that brought together international experts and homeless people with the goal of finding solutions. Surveys and workshops involving local people, housing associations and council duty-bearers have explored the potential of the Mackie’s site.” This research was the basis for the competition launched in 2022. Read more… 
Perkins & Will
Carrying the label, “Artistic Ideas Competition,” five firms vied for a commission to design a new National Museum of the U.S. Navy. Household names, the five were
Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG) Copenhagen/ New York
Gehry Partners (Los Angeles)
DLR Group (Columbus, OH)
Perkins&Will (Chicago) Winner!
Quinn Evans (Ann Arbor) With a site not yet identified, it is possible that a final design will look quite different from the present submission. the Navy has expressed a preference for M Street SE and 6th Street SE, near the Navy Yard in Washington, D.C. Six Firms Competed to Rethink the Future of a Major Museum 
Aerial view of winning design ©Nieto Sobejano Arquitectos (courtesy Malcolm Reading Consultants)
The history of the Dallas Museum of Art’s expansion has been punctuated by several moves, culminating in a new building designed by Edward Larrabee Barnes in 1984. The importance of this move to a new, somewhat desolate location in the city cannot be underestimated: it has led to the revitalization of what is now called the “Arts District,” with the relocation of various arts institutions to new facilities: the opera house (Foster and Partners), Dee and Charles Wyly Performing Arts Theater (REX/OMA), Nasher Sculpture Center (Renzo Piano), and I.M. Pei’s Meyerson Symphony Center being among the most significant. Read more… |
