2009 McKinley House CompetitionSponsor: Buffalo Emerging Professionals (BEP), a committee of AIA Buffalo/WNY, and AIA Buffalo/WNY Type: Open to architects licensed 10 years or less, intern architects, students
Fees:
Professional and licensed architects 35 USD AIA & AIAS members / 50 USD Non-members
Intern architects 30 USD AIA & AIAS members / 40 USD Non-members
Students 25 USD AIA & AIAS members / 30 USD Non-members
Awards:
1st Prize – 2,000 USD
2nd Prize – 1,000 USD
Timetable:
23 April 2009 Release of competition brief
8 June 2009 Last day of registration
11 June 2009 Submission date of competition entries
June 30 2009 Announcement of winning entry
July & August 2009 Production of construction documents
Jury:
Richard Baer – Baer & Associates / Construction Industry Education Foundation
Brian Carter, RIBA – Dean, University at Buffalo School of Architecture and Planning
Simon Faber, Assoc. AIA – BEP
Kelly Hayes-McAlonie, AIA – AIANYS / AIA Buffalo/WNY Immediate Past President
David Jameson, FAIA – David Jameson Architect, Inc
Shanntina Moore, Assoc AIA, LEED ® AP – BEP Chair / AIA Buffalo/WNY / AIANYS Assoc. Director
Jim Staebell – McKinley High School Carpentry Program
Pat Sullivan – Scranton’s Thruway Builders Division of United Materials / Construction Industry Education Foundation
Design Challenge:
Entrants are required to design a modular home to be built by junior and senior high school students in the McKinley High School carpentry shop in Buffalo, NY and later transported to an urban site via a flatbed trailer. Entrants must consider NYS Department of Transportation guidelines for transporting the modular units to its final site. Construction documents will be produced post-competition by a licensed New York State architect and submitted for September construction.
Submission Requirements:
– Maximum modular element area: 12’ (W) x 50’(L)
– Maximum building height 1 -1/2 story building. Please note: four (4) – 12’ x 50’ x 10’ units are not permitted due to limited storage space
– Provide 2 – 3 bedrooms
– Provide at least 1 ADA accessible bathroom; 1 -1/2 baths minimum
– Integrate locally sourced materials including sustainable and recycled materials
– Use standard material sizes and increments (i.e. 4’ or 8’ drywall) and conventional detailing methods while challenging the general aesthetic appearance of the building
– Designs must provide flexibility regarding site orientation, entrance to the building and allowance for optional design elements (i.e. mudroom, porch, etc.)
– All drawings must be 24” (H) x 36” (W) in “landscape” format; 10 drawings maximum, including specifications (please see the Appendix for an example of the minimum level of drawing detail required).
– Submit competition materials and registration fee via e-mail
For more information, go to: http://aiabuffalowny.org/BEP/mckinley
Email: mckinley.competition@gmail.com
|
SWA/Balsley Wins Paveletskaya Plaza Landscape Competition 
Aerial view at night – courtesy SWA/Balsley 5+ Design
Of the nine railway stations in Moscow, Paveletskaya is the largest and one of the last of those that opened around the turn of the century. Compared to other Moscow stations, Paveletskaya, designed by Alexander Krasovsky and opened in 1900, represented a lower-key presence in its sprawling configuration, similar to palaces such as a Sans Souci without the ornamentation. The original site for the recent competition included a small park facing the station, bordered on one side by the Ring Road. Post WWII, the site was bifurcated by a road, thus separating the front entrance of the station from the grassy area facing it. Read more… Young Architects in Competitions When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset? This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions. Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link: https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/
Image Courtesy Network Rail
From Grand Central Station to King’s Cross in London, railway stations have often represented some of the major architectural accomplishments of our times. But those edifices have been primarily located in great cities. In the U.K. there are over 2,000 stations located in medium-sized, small, and rural communities. Most of those are ‘quick stop’ locations, and not the destination terminals where space requirements often result in state of the art design. In July of last year, U.K.’s Network Rail, in collaboration with the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) launched a competition to identify a concept for a design that would be suitable for the medium to small-sized rail stations, at the same time updating the program to fit the modern needs of such a facility. The competition was open internationally and received 213 entries from 34 countries last September. Read more… The Urban Confluence Silicon Valley Competition
Urban Confluence Silicon Valley winner: ©SMAR Architecture Studio
After several stops and starts over an extended period of time, the winner of the Urban Confluence Design Competition was named in early March, 2021. SMAR Architecture Studio’s The Breeze of Innovation, which prevailed over two other shortlisted finalists from the original 963 entries, won with a novel tower-like structure consisting primarily of hundreds of rods, generating energy while swaying in the wind. Read More…
Pedestrian perspective
The result of an effort from a professor at the TUM (Technische Universität München) to restore the Budludzha Monument in Bulgaria, located in a remote location on a mountain top in that country, we discovered that it originally was the result of a 1959 design competition won by the young Bulgarian architect, Georgi Stoilov. Read more… A Flawed Plan Leads to Budget Issues
Competition rendering of project looking south to Mies museum ©Herzog de Meuron
Once considered on the forefront of modern architecture in post-WWII Europe, Berlin has had its share of questionable decisions concerning important urban projects in recent history. Beginning with the rebirth of the Berlin Palace (Humboldt Forum) on the Spree by Italian architect, Franco Stella, and now followed by Herzog de Meuron’s controversial addition to Mies’s 20th Century Art Museum, the times when one could look to Berlin as a signpost of architectural innovation can only be viewed in the rear view mirror.
Read more… |
