Sponsor: Hawa AG Sliding Hardware Systems
Type: Student
Location: Zurich
Language: German
Fee: Free
Eligibility: Students
Timetable:
August 30, 2011 – Registration deadline
October 28 – Submission deadline
Awards:
Total sum of 12,000 Swiss Francs distributed amongst three winners
Design
Read more…
Sponsor: Philadelphia Center for Architecture
Type: Student, Urban Design
Location: Philadelphia
Language: English
Fee: Free
Eligibility: University-level students in any major
Timetable:
September 08, 2011 – Registration deadline
September 30, 2011 – Submission deadline
Awards:
First Place – $5,000
Design
Read more…
Sponsor: Office of Urban Transformation Research Type: Open International Location: Melbourne Language: English Fee: $30AUD per person or $150 per group before May 2 $50AUD per person or $200 per group after May 2 Eligibility: No restrictions Timetable: May 2, 2011 – Early application deadline May 31 – Application deadline July 6 – Notification of
Read more…
Sponsor: Hazelden New York Type: Student Location: New York Language: English Fee: Free Eligibility: Students in interior design, landscape architecture, or architecture Timetable: May 15, 2011 – Registration deadline June 15 – Submission deadline July 1 – Finalists announced July 15 – Winners announced Awards: First prize – $2,500 Second prize – $1,500 Third prize
Read more…
Sponsor: Suckerpunch Type: Open International Ideas Location: New York Language: English Fee: $35 before May 23 $65 after May 23 Eligibility: No restrictions Timetable: May 13, 2011 – Questions deadline August 14 – Registration deadline August 22 – Submission deadline September 5 – Winners announced Awards: $2,500 total in prizes Jury: Robert Brackett, ffflourish Lonn
Read more…
Sponsor: Busan Metropolitan City government Type: International, open, professional and student Languages: Korean and English Fees: US$100 (120,000 Korean Won) Timetable: 25 April 2011 – Official announcement of competition 25 Apr. – 25 May 2011, 5:00PM (GMT+9) – Registration 11-20 May 2011 – Questions/inquiries 25 May 2011 – Answers posted on the website 3 Aug.
Read more…
Sponsor: Esta e a minha cidade? Type: Open International Ideas Location: Oporto Language: English and Portugese Fee: Free Eligibility: No restrictions Submission Deadline: May 31, 2011 Awards: First prize – 250 Euro Second prize – 100 Euro Third prize – 100 Euro Jury: Pedro Bandeira, architect Pedro Bismarck, architect Joao Fernandes, Director, Serralves Museum of
Read more…
Sponsor: Malcolm Reading Consultants Type: International two-stage Location: Aberdeen Language: English Fee: Free Eligibility: No restrictions Timetable: June 13, 2011 – Expression of interest deadline July 18 – Shortlisted teams informed September 16 – Deadline for tenders December – Winning team announced Design Challenge: The £140m City Garden Project will radically transform a strategic central
Read more…
Sponsor: The Department of Higher Education, MOE Type: Student Location: Taiwan Language: English Fee: Free Eligibility: Students under age 26 Timetable: June 15, 2011 – Submission deadline Late June – Preliminary selection August 25 – Deadline for mockup and printout submission Early September – Final selection Awards: Grand Prix – $12,000 Gold – $8,000 for
Read more…
Sponsor: Seoul Metropolitan Government Type: Open International Ideas Location: Seoul Language: English Fee: Free Eligibility: No restrictions Timetable: July 28, 2011 – Registration deadline September 30 – Email announcement of judging results Awards: Grand prize – $4,500 Gold prize – $2,200 Silver prize – $900 Bronze prize – $450 Runner up – $270 Honorable mention
Read more…
|
Helsinki Central Library, by ALA Architects (2012-2018)
The world has experienced a limited number of open competitions over the past three decades, but even with diminishing numbers, some stand out among projects in their categories that can’t be ignored for the high quality and degree of creativity they revealed. Included among those are several invited competitions that were extraordinary in their efforts to explore new avenues of institutional and museum design. Some might ask why the Vietnam Memorial is not mentioned here. Only included in our list are competitions that were covered by us, beginning in 1990 with COMPETITIONS magazine to the present day. As for what category a project under construction (Science Island), might belong to or fundraising still in progress (San Jose’s Urban Confluence or the Cold War Memorial competition, Wisconsin), we would classify the former as “built” and wait and see what happens with the latter—keeping our fingers crossed for a positive outcome.
Read More…
Young Architects in Competitions
When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset?
This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions.
Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link:
https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/
RUR model perspective – ©RUR
New Kaohsiung Port and Cruise Terminal, Taiwan (2011-2020)
Reiser+Umemoto RUR Architecture PC/ Jesse Reiser – U.S.A.
with
Fei & Cheng Associates/Philip T.C. Fei –R.O.C. (Tendener)
This was probably the last international open competition result that was built in Taiwan. A later competition for the Keelung Harbor Service Building Competition, won by Neil Denari of the U.S., the result of a shortlisting procedure, was not built. The fact that the project by RUR was eventually completed—the result of the RUR/Fei & Cheng’s winning entry there—certainly goes back to the collaborative role of those to firms in winning the 2008 Taipei Pop Music Center competition, a collaboration that should not be underestimated in setting the stage for this competition.
Read more…
Winning entry ©Herzog de Meuron
In visiting any museum, one might wonder what important works of art are out of view in storage, possibly not considered high profile enough to see the light of day? In Korea, an answer to this question is in the making.
It can come as no surprise that museums are running out of storage space. This is not just the case with long established “western” museums, but elsewhere throughout the world as well. In Seoul, South Korea, such an issue has been addressed by planning for a new kind of storage facility, the Seouipul Open Storage Museum. The new institution will house artworks and artifacts of three major museums in Seoul: the Seoul Museum of Modern Art, the Seoul Museum of History, and the Seoul Museum of Craft Art.
Read more…
Belfast Looks Toward an Equitable and Sustainable Housing Model
Birdseye view of Mackie site ©Matthew Lloyd Architects
If one were to look for a theme that is common to most affordable housing models, public access has been based primarily on income, or to be more precise, the very lack of it. Here it is no different, with Belfast’s homeless problem posing a major concern. But the competition also hopes to address another of Belfast’s decades-long issues—its religious divide. There is an underlying assumption here that religion will play no part in a selection process. The competition’s local sponsor was “Take Back the City,” its membership consisting mainly of social advocates. In setting priorities for the housing model, the group interviewed potential future dwellers as well as stakeholders to determine the nature of this model. Among those actions taken was the “photo- mapping of available land in Belfast, which could be used to tackle the housing crisis. Since 2020, (the group) hosted seminars that brought together international experts and homeless people with the goal of finding solutions. Surveys and workshops involving local people, housing associations and council duty-bearers have explored the potential of the Mackie’s site.” This research was the basis for the competition launched in 2022.
Read more…
Alster Swimming Pool after restoration (2023)
Linking Two Competitions with Three Modernist Projects
Hardly a week goes by without the news of another architectural icon being threatened with demolition. A modernist swimming pool in Hamburg, Germany belonged in this category, even though the concrete shell roof had been placed under landmark status. When the possibility of being replaced by a high-rise building, it came to the notice of architects at von Gerkan Marg Partners (gmp), who in collaboration with schlaich bergermann partner (sbp), developed a feasibility study that became the basis for the decision to retain and refurbish the building.
Read more…
|
