UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE ANNOUNCES WINNER OF
INTERNATIONAL DESIGN COMPETITION FOR NEW LAW SCHOOL
Winning Entry
 |
||||
|
Type: Open, two-stage Eligibility: Architects, town planners and urban designers Timetable: 7 January 2009 – Deadline for submissions Design challenge: Ideas are sought for improvements Sponsors: Univ. of Northampton, RIBA Type: Open, anonymous first stage; five finalists invited to second stage Eligibility: EU, licensed architects Fee: £40 Language: English Timetable: Sponsor: Design Trust for Public Space; Bronx Museum of the Arts Type: Open, international, ideas Location: Bronx, New York Language: English Fee: $30 Timetable: Sponsor: City of Montréal, Rio Tinto Alcan Type: International, RfP, 2-stage (Five finalists will be selected from anonymous first stage) In phase 2, the finalists will form multidisciplinary teams to develop and fine tune their concepts and submit them to the same jury. The winning Sponsor: Athens (GA) Arts Council Type: Open, National, one-stage Language: English Fee: US$60.00 (check or money order) Eligibility: Open to designers, artists, architects and students who are residents of Sponsor(s): New England Society of Architectural Historians; Harvard University Graduate School of Design American Institute of Architects, NY Chapter Boston Society of Architects Type: Open, ideas Read more… |
Three Finalists: Kaunas M.K. Čiurlionis Concert Centre
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania Type: Open, international
The three finalists were:
The six practices given honorable mentions were:
OFFICE 52 at Carnegie Mellon
Form and Dichroic Light
In his introduction to Form and Dichroic LIght, Michael Crosbie never mentions the term, “wild card,” to describe Office 52’s participation in the invited competition for the Carnegie Mellon Engineering Building. The four finalists, picked from a list of 17 firms, also included three household names: ZGF, Wilson, and BCJ (Bohlin Cywinski, Jackson). So what possible chance could a firm, which had just recently opened a small office in Portland, Oregon, have against a competition lineup of this magnitude? But as OFFICE 52 Principal, Isaac Campbell explained, as a small firm, “we were quite nimble,” and the $50,000 stipend the firms all received to produce a design could allow OFFICE 52 more time to undertake the research involved than might be the case with a larger office, where a cost controller is constantly focusing on the operation.
A Museum as Entertainment LandscapeThe Taoyuan Museum of Arts Competition
The competition for the Taoyuan Museum of Arts is similar to now what has become the typical invited format for major projects in Taiwan. In this case, 14 architectural teams submitted their qualifications, and four qualified for the second competition stage. They were Q-LAB + menacoo architecten, Joe Shih. Architects + Riken Yamamoto and Field Shop, Ricky Liu & Associates, and JJPan and Partners, Architects and Planners + MVRDV.
|
|||
|
Copyright © 2019 Competitions All Rights Reserved COMPETITIONS, P.O. Box 20445, Louisville, Ky 40250 U.S.A Ph: (502) 451-3623; Fax: (502) 451-3623 Website: https://competitions.org E: scollyer@competitions.org Privacy Policy: CP-Privacy-Policy.pdf IMPORTANT NOTICE : Unless otherwise indicated, photographs of buildings and projects are from professional or institutional archives. All reproduction is prohibited unless authorized by the architects, designers, office managers, consortia or archives centers concerned. The Competition Project, Inc. is not held responsible for any omissions or inaccuracies, but appreciate all comments and pertinent information that will permit necessary modifications during future updates. Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
||||
