 |
||||
|
Sponsor: FDI Habitat Type: EU, invited Location: Montpelier, France Process: EOI, shortlist with three (3) finalists Language: French Timetable: 1 September 2020 – Deadline for applications Project: 56 assisted living housing units For more information: fdi-habitat.achatpublic.com
Sponsor: GIE GRAND PARIS HABITAT Type: EU, invited Location: Paris, France Process: EOI, shortlist with three (3) finalists Language: French Timetable: 2 September 2020 – Deadline for applications Project: 60 intergenerational affordable housing units For more information: www.achatpublic.com Organizer: The American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) Eligibility: U.S.-based architects who are either currently seeking licensure or have been licensed for fewer than 10 years Deadline: November 1, 2020 Fee: Free to enter Prize: $15,000 Jury: • Pascale Sablan, AIA, Senior Associate at S9ARCHITECTURE • Bob Type: open, international, two-stage Process: Stage 2 will consist of seven teams shortlisted from stage 1 Location: Seoul, Korea. Languages: English, Korean Eligibility: Architects, planners, etc. Timetable: 14 August 2020 – Registration deadline Scope of project: Main use: Facilities for cultural activities and assembly Scale: The gross floor area
Type: open, international, anonymous, two-stage Location: Seoul, Korea. Languages: English, Korean Eligibility: Architects, planners, etc. Timetable: 21 August 2020 – Registration deadline Scope of project: Main use: Facilities for cultural activities and assembly Scope of project: The spatial scope corresponding to a draft plan of 5,500㎡ as presented in the
Sponsor: SIA “DG31” Type: Open, International, one-stage Location: Riga, Latvia Process: EOI, shortlist with three (3) finalists Languages: Latvian and English Fees: none, but participants must register to receive the documents Timetable: 12 October 2020 – Deadline for submissions Jury: (see competition brief) Awards: • 1st Type: open, RfQ, two-stage Location: Czech Republic Languages: Czech, English Eligibility: Registered architects/landscape architects Process: The jury will shortlist six teams from the first, RfQ round to participate in the second round of the competition The Jury will evaluate the submitted portfolios based on the degree of fulfillment of the following criteria: a) total Sponsor: British Network Rail Type: open, international, anonymous Location: U.K. Languages: English Eligibility: Architects, planners, etc. Timetable: 4 August 2020 – End of Q&A period 11 September 2020 – Last date for registration 15 September 2020 – Submission deadline (Phase one) Judging Panel: Lucy Musgrave OBE (founding director of Publica) Jonathan McDowell (director, Matter Architecture)
Sponsor: Seoul Metropolitan Government Jongno-gu Location: Seoul, South Korea Type: Open, international Language: Korean, English Fee: None Eligibility: Both Korean and foreign licensed architects can participate, and one team can be made of up to three architects but one appointed representative should carry out the registration. Timetable: 20 August 2020 – Registration deadline 27
Sponsor: Yongxin County People’s Government, Yongxin, China Media support: Urban Environment Design (UED) magazine Type: International, ideas, one-stage Language: English Fee: None Eligibility: Students and design professionals Timetable: 1 September 2020 – Registration deadline 15 September 2020 – Submission deadline Q&A will |
Young Architects in CompetitionsWhen Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset?
This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions.
Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link: Uusi Kansallinen – National Finnish Museum Competition: Following a Time Honored Paradigm
When major cultural institutions in Finland plan a new building project, one can almost always assume that an open competition will be the vehicle by which the client settles on the building’s design. The only question is, will this be organized in a format open to local, Scandinavian, or international architects. In the case of the National Museum of Finland annex competition, it was open to architects throughout the world — resulting in 185 entries.
Senses and SensitivityThe Opening of Taichung’s Central Park by Catherine Mosbach/Philippe Rahm
 View from the south with downtown Taichung in the distance image: ©Mosbach/Rahm
The abandonment and closing of airports, including decommissioning those that were used for military purposes, has presented design communities with several opportunities to convert them entirely to civilian purposes. Notable among those which have been the result of competitions are Orange County Great Park, Irvine, California (Ken Smith Landscape Architects), The Estonian National Museum (Dan Dorell, Lina Ghotmeh and Tsuyoshi Tane), and Toronto’s less successful Downsview Park competition, whereby the winning design by OMA, with trees as the primary feature, has been basically ignored. Instead, the area has become the site of numerous commercial and residential projects.
Ground Breaking at Science IslandSMAR’s Winning Entry Gets the Green Light
The winning competition entry in the 2016 Science Island competition in Kaunas, Lithuania by SMAR Architects may only take five years to realize—from the date of the competition to completion. This is encouraging news, as the duration of such projects resulting from a competition can often take much longer—sometimes up to 8-10 years.
Explaining the contributions of a World War II hero and later President of the United States on a very modest site on Independence Avenue just off the Washington Mall is tantamount to asking an author to describe the life of this person in no more than one paragraph. But on September 17th, after a long and bumpy journey, lasting almost 20 years and navigating a warren of the DC approval processes and public scrutiny, the Eisenhower Memorial finally was dedicated and opened to the public. Designed by Frank Gehry, it has received mixed reviews, the majority being more positive. But most have pointed out that the memorial is more impressive at night than in full daylight. This is due primarily to the illumination of an almost block-long metallic tapestry—featuring a sketch by Gehry, which depicts his interpretation of the cliffs of the Normandy coastline where the Americans landed on D-Day. Reimagining Brooklyn Bridge: The Reinvention of a 19th Century Icon
While looking for new adventures on a visit to New York City, friends suggested that I take time to walk across the Brooklyn Bridge—certainly a New York icon. For those intending to undertake this trek across the bridge for the first time, the bridge consists of layers, with a large platform for pedestrians on top of a lower level for cars and the metro system. Traversing this connection for the first time between Manhattan and Brooklyn is not just about getting from one place to another, but experiencing a great scenic view of both boroughs and occasionally interacting with other bridge crossers. As for the latter, they provide a flavor of the city’s demographics, as opposed to similar experiences one might have of the city’s inhabitants when riding the city’s subway system. |
|||
|
Copyright © 2021 Competitions All Rights Reserved Competitions-Archive LLC, Ph: (502) 451-3623; Fax: (502) 451-3623 Website: https://competitions.org E: scollyer@competitions.org Privacy Policy: CP-Privacy-Policy.pdf IMPORTANT NOTICE : Unless otherwise indicated, photographs of buildings and projects are from professional or institutional archives. All reproduction is prohibited unless authorized by the architects, designers, office managers, consortia or archives centers concerned. The Competitions-Archive LLC is not held responsible for any omissions or inaccuracies, but appreciate all comments and pertinent information that will permit necessary modifications during future updates. Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
||||
