Sponsor: John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the Miami Downtown Development Authority, Marquis, and Akerman Senterfitt
Type: open, 1-stage, internationalLanguage: English
Eligibility: Architects, designers, students, and amateurs from around the world are invited to participate.
Registration fee: none
Awards:1st Prize – $8,0002nd Prize – $4,0003rd Prize – $2,000
Timetable:14 October, 2009 – registration deadline28
Read more…
Sponsor: RIBA, Community Gateway Association
Type: 2 – stage, open
Language: English
Eligibility: The competition is open to all qualified architects and to architect-led multi-disciplinary teamsRegistration fee: £35.00Awards:Each team invited to take part in the second phase of this competition will receive a payment of £3000.
Timetable:21 September, 2009 – site visit21 October, 2009 –
Read more…
Sponsor: Government of the Atlantic Department, the School of Architecture, Art and Design and the Architecture program at the Autonomous University of the Caribbean
Type: open, international
Language: English, Spanish
Eligibility: architects, urbanists, artists, and interior designers
Registration fee:$20 – early registration$30 – registration$40 – late registration
Timetable:11 September, 2009 – early registration deadline1
Read more…
Sponsor: d3
Type: open, 1-stage
Language: English
Registration fee:$25 – students$50 – professionals
Timetable:4 January, 2010 – registration deadline15 January, 2010 – submission deadline
Awards:1st Prize – $5002nd Prize – $2503rd Prize – $125
Jury: To be announced
Design Challenge:Exploration of housing typologies reveals vast the potential of overlaying urban, contextual, cultural, social, and
Read more…
Sponsor: USITT
Type: open, student
Language: English
Eligibility: architectural and theater students
Registration fee: none
Timetable:20 November, 2009 – registration deadline19 January, 2010 – submission deadline
Jury: Theatre Architect, Theatre Consultant, Acoustician based in Los Angeles, CA, USA to be announced
Design Challenge: The competition poses the design question, “What is the Ideal Theatre
Read more…
Sponsor: Air Force Villages, San Antonio, TX
Type: Open, 1-stage
Language: English
Eligibility:This competition is open to U.S.-based licensed and aspiring architects, designers, engineers, landscape architects, and students enrolled in college-level design programs in any of these areas of study. Competitors may enter as individuals or as a part of a team. Multi-disciplinary teams
Read more…
The six finalist schemes for the competition to design a new Students’ Centre for the London School of Economics are to be exhibited in London. The designs will be displayed throughout September at New London Architecture, the Centre for London’s Built Environment.
The exhibition follows the recent announcement of Dublin based practice O’Donnell &
Read more…
London based practice Wilkinson Eyre Architects has won the competition to design a new swimming pool for Worthing Borough Council. Wilkinson Eyre were selected in preference to Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios, also based in London. Both teams had been identified as preferred teams at the end of the first stage of the competition and were
Read more…
|
Young Architects in Competitions
When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset?
This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions.
Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link:
https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/
Winning entry ©Herzog de Meuron
In visiting any museum, one might wonder what important works of art are out of view in storage, possibly not considered high profile enough to see the light of day? In Korea, an answer to this question is in the making.
It can come as no surprise that museums are running out of storage space. This is not just the case with long established “western” museums, but elsewhere throughout the world as well. In Seoul, South Korea, such an issue has been addressed by planning for a new kind of storage facility, the Seouipul Open Storage Museum. The new institution will house artworks and artifacts of three major museums in Seoul: the Seoul Museum of Modern Art, the Seoul Museum of History, and the Seoul Museum of Craft Art.
Read more…
Belfast Looks Toward an Equitable and Sustainable Housing Model
Birdseye view of Mackie site ©Matthew Lloyd Architects
If one were to look for a theme that is common to most affordable housing models, public access has been based primarily on income, or to be more precise, the very lack of it. Here it is no different, with Belfast’s homeless problem posing a major concern. But the competition also hopes to address another of Belfast’s decades-long issues—its religious divide. There is an underlying assumption here that religion will play no part in a selection process. The competition’s local sponsor was “Take Back the City,” its membership consisting mainly of social advocates. In setting priorities for the housing model, the group interviewed potential future dwellers as well as stakeholders to determine the nature of this model. Among those actions taken was the “photo- mapping of available land in Belfast, which could be used to tackle the housing crisis. Since 2020, (the group) hosted seminars that brought together international experts and homeless people with the goal of finding solutions. Surveys and workshops involving local people, housing associations and council duty-bearers have explored the potential of the Mackie’s site.” This research was the basis for the competition launched in 2022.
Read more…
Alster Swimming Pool after restoration (2023)
Linking Two Competitions with Three Modernist Projects
Hardly a week goes by without the news of another architectural icon being threatened with demolition. A modernist swimming pool in Hamburg, Germany belonged in this category, even though the concrete shell roof had been placed under landmark status. When the possibility of being replaced by a high-rise building, it came to the notice of architects at von Gerkan Marg Partners (gmp), who in collaboration with schlaich bergermann partner (sbp), developed a feasibility study that became the basis for the decision to retain and refurbish the building.
Read more…
A Church Ruin as Reconciliation Memorial
View of winning design from south ©Heninghan Peng Architects
For those tourists visiting Berlin today, the sudden approach to the ruins of a 1895 church building located on the city’s downtown Breitscheidplatz would certainly arouse their curiosity. One of the few remaining relics of World War II in the city, the church has now been the subject of a competition: Redesign and renovation of the Old Tower of the Friedrich Wilhelm Memorial Church (Umgestaltung des Alten Turms der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gedächnis-Kirche).
Read more…
|