The competition to design a new College Chapel in Oxfordshire received an outstanding response with over 126 expressions of interest received from architects all over the world.
The shortlisted practices are :
– Massimiliano Fuksas Architetto, Rome– Sarah Hare Architects, London– Niall McLaughlin Architects, London– Terry Pawson Architects Ltd, London– Ushida Findlay Architects, Edinburgh
Read more…
Type: open, international, 1-stage
Language: Languages: Maltese. Portuguese. Swedish. German. Polish. Slovenian. Slovak. Danish. Czech. Latvian. French. Italian. Lithuanian. Finnish. Estonian. Spanish. Hungarian. English. Greek. Dutch. Other: All of the above with translations of all documents in Macedonian language.
Registration fee: 50EUR
Eligibility: architects and engineers
Awards: 5,700EUR
Timetable: 11 August, 2009 – submission deadline
Read more…
Sponsor: DECATHLON SA
Type: 2-phase, international
Eligibility: individuals and multidisciplinary teams headed by an Architecture graduate and made up of a maximum of 4 members, all of whom must possess a higher education qualifications. All entrants must be born after 31 December, 1975.
Awards:1st Prize – 3,000EUR2nd Prize – 2,000EUR3rd Prize – 1,000EUR
Timetable:7 July,
Read more…
Type: open, 1-stage
Language: Macedonian
Registration fee: 25EUR
Eligibility: The bid applications from the foreign entries should be delivered in Macedonian or should be translated to Macedonian by an authorized translator.
Awards: 1st Prize – 16,500EUR
Timetable:27 July, 2009 – submission deadline
Design Challenge: Proposal of an architectonic urban concept for renovation of St. Clement’s
Read more…
Sponsor: MNBAQ
Type: open, international, 2-stage
Language: communication and correspondence in English and French; all contractual documents and presentations must be in French.
Eligibility: licensed architects and architectural firms
Awards:175,000CAD – to each competitor who presents a conceptual proposal to conform to the requirements of contractual documents25,000CAD – to 10 teams not selected to continue
Read more…
Sponsor: AIA Trust
Type: open, 1-stage
Language: English
Registration fee:AIA Associate Member – $25 (early registration)/$50 (late registration)Non-AIA unregistered – $35 (early registration)/$70 (late registration)AIA Member – $50 (early registration)/$100 (late registration)Non-AIA registered architect – $75 (early registration)/$150 (late registration)
Eligibility:All design professionals who have graduated from a school of architecture and have been out
Read more…
Sponsor: Yoshioka-Bunko foundation. Shinkachiku-sha
Type: open, 1-stage
Language: English, Japanese
Registration fee: none
Awards:Prize: total: 1,500,000 yen
Timetable:16 September, 2009 – registration and submission deadlineWinners will be announced in the 2009 December issue of“SHINKENCHIKU” , Vol. 76 ( 2009 Winter ) of “THE JAPAN ARCHITECT”
Jury:Jun Aoki – principal of Jun Aoki & Associates
Design
Read more…
Sponsor: Housing Corporation Ymere, Netherlands Architecture Institute (NAI)
Type: open, international, 2-phase
Language: English
Eligibility: registered architects, designers, landscape architects and other cultural practitioners
Awards:1st Prize (maximum of 5) – 10,000EUR each
Timetable:31 July, 2009 – registration deadline12 August, 2009 – submission deadline12 September, 2009 – winners announced
Jury:Mels Crouwel, architect at Benthem Crouwel (chairman)Ronald
Read more…
Sponsor: The Architect’s Newspaper, UCLA School of Arts and Architecture, Ziman Center for Real Estate Development
Type: 2-stage
Language: English
Registration fee:$40 – per student or independent team$100 – professional team
Eligibility: Designers of all fields are eligible to submit for this competition, which is staged in two phases. Multi-disciplinary teams are particularly encouraged.
Awards:$5,000
Read more…
Sponsor: eVolo Magazine
Language: English
Registration fee:$60 – early registration (until November 17, 2009)$85 – late registration (after November 17, 2009)
Eligibility: all students, architects, engineers, and designers. Multidisciplinary teams are encouraged.
Awards:1st Place – $2,0002nd Place – $1,0003rd Place – $500
Timetable:17 November, 2009 – early registration deadline10 January, 2010 – registration deadline18 January,
Read more…
|
Helsinki Central Library, by ALA Architects (2012-2018)
The world has experienced a limited number of open competitions over the past three decades, but even with diminishing numbers, some stand out among projects in their categories that can’t be ignored for the high quality and degree of creativity they revealed. Included among those are several invited competitions that were extraordinary in their efforts to explore new avenues of institutional and museum design. Some might ask why the Vietnam Memorial is not mentioned here. Only included in our list are competitions that were covered by us, beginning in 1990 with COMPETITIONS magazine to the present day. As for what category a project under construction (Science Island), might belong to or fundraising still in progress (San Jose’s Urban Confluence or the Cold War Memorial competition, Wisconsin), we would classify the former as “built” and wait and see what happens with the latter—keeping our fingers crossed for a positive outcome.
Read More…
Young Architects in Competitions
When Competitions and a New Generation of Ideas Elevate Architectural Quality
by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer
published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020
271 illustrations in color and black & white
Available in PDF and eBook formats
ISBN 9781988962047
What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common? These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset?
This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs. The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions.
Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link:
https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/
RUR model perspective – ©RUR
New Kaohsiung Port and Cruise Terminal, Taiwan (2011-2020)
Reiser+Umemoto RUR Architecture PC/ Jesse Reiser – U.S.A.
with
Fei & Cheng Associates/Philip T.C. Fei –R.O.C. (Tendener)
This was probably the last international open competition result that was built in Taiwan. A later competition for the Keelung Harbor Service Building Competition, won by Neil Denari of the U.S., the result of a shortlisting procedure, was not built. The fact that the project by RUR was eventually completed—the result of the RUR/Fei & Cheng’s winning entry there—certainly goes back to the collaborative role of those to firms in winning the 2008 Taipei Pop Music Center competition, a collaboration that should not be underestimated in setting the stage for this competition.
Read more…
Winning entry ©Herzog de Meuron
In visiting any museum, one might wonder what important works of art are out of view in storage, possibly not considered high profile enough to see the light of day? In Korea, an answer to this question is in the making.
It can come as no surprise that museums are running out of storage space. This is not just the case with long established “western” museums, but elsewhere throughout the world as well. In Seoul, South Korea, such an issue has been addressed by planning for a new kind of storage facility, the Seouipul Open Storage Museum. The new institution will house artworks and artifacts of three major museums in Seoul: the Seoul Museum of Modern Art, the Seoul Museum of History, and the Seoul Museum of Craft Art.
Read more…
Belfast Looks Toward an Equitable and Sustainable Housing Model
Birdseye view of Mackie site ©Matthew Lloyd Architects
If one were to look for a theme that is common to most affordable housing models, public access has been based primarily on income, or to be more precise, the very lack of it. Here it is no different, with Belfast’s homeless problem posing a major concern. But the competition also hopes to address another of Belfast’s decades-long issues—its religious divide. There is an underlying assumption here that religion will play no part in a selection process. The competition’s local sponsor was “Take Back the City,” its membership consisting mainly of social advocates. In setting priorities for the housing model, the group interviewed potential future dwellers as well as stakeholders to determine the nature of this model. Among those actions taken was the “photo- mapping of available land in Belfast, which could be used to tackle the housing crisis. Since 2020, (the group) hosted seminars that brought together international experts and homeless people with the goal of finding solutions. Surveys and workshops involving local people, housing associations and council duty-bearers have explored the potential of the Mackie’s site.” This research was the basis for the competition launched in 2022.
Read more…
Alster Swimming Pool after restoration (2023)
Linking Two Competitions with Three Modernist Projects
Hardly a week goes by without the news of another architectural icon being threatened with demolition. A modernist swimming pool in Hamburg, Germany belonged in this category, even though the concrete shell roof had been placed under landmark status. When the possibility of being replaced by a high-rise building, it came to the notice of architects at von Gerkan Marg Partners (gmp), who in collaboration with schlaich bergermann partner (sbp), developed a feasibility study that became the basis for the decision to retain and refurbish the building.
Read more…
|
