7th Avenue Pedestrian Zone: Public Art Project
Open, international, EoI
Calgary, Alberta
14 Dec 2007 – EoI Deadline
01 Feb 2008 – Submission Deadline
 |
||||
|
08 Skyscraper Competition Open, international, 1-stage, anonymous, ideas New York, NY 19 Feb 2008 – Registration Deadline 26 Feb 2008 – Submission Deadline (via online) 10th Arquine International Architecture Competition: The Bicentennial Towers Open, international, 1-stage, anonymous, ideas Mexico City 04 Feb 2008 – Late Registration Deadline 29 Feb 2008 – Submission Deadline (postmarked by) South Street Seaport: Re-envisioning the Urban Edge Open, international, 1-stage, ideas New York, New York 25 Jan 2008 – Registration Deadline 25 Jan 2008 – Submission Deadline (arrive by) Metropolis Next Generation Competition 2008 Re:Store Open, international, ideas Not Site Specific 15 Jan 2008 – Registration Deadline 01 Feb 2008 – Submission Deadline (postmarked by) AMD Open Architecture Challenge Architecture for Humanity & AMD Open, international, RfP Not Site Specific 15 Jan 2008 – Registration Deadline 15 Jan 2008 – Submission Deadline 6th IAHH International Student Design Competition: Planning and designing a micro-cosmic sustainable humane habitat Open, international, student, ideas Not Site Specific 15 Jan 2008 – Late Registration Deadline (by air mail) 22 Jan 2008 – Submission Deadline Chichen Itzá 2008 Open, international, RfP Chichen Itzá, Mexico 31 Dec 2007 – Late Registration Deadline 15 Jan 2008 – Submission Deadline Jerusalem 2050 Open, international, ideas Jerusalem, Israel 31 Dec 2007 – Registration Deadline 31 Dec 2007 – Submission Deadline |
Zaha Hadid Architects Wins UAE Masterplan Competition
Following the international competition, ARADA has appointed Zaha Hadid Architects (ZHA) to design the Central Hub, the centerpiece of Aljada, the developer’s masterplan in Sharjah, UAE. The other competitors in the invited competition were HOK (U.S.) and RMJM (London).
Developed with environmental considerations integrated throughout the masterplan to minimize the consumption of resources, the proposal conceptualizes the moment a water droplet strikes the earth’s surface, captured in an array of elliptical buildings designed to channel prevailing winds into civic spaces and courtyards to facilitate cooling during the summer months. The central observation tower is surrounded by vibrant public squares with water features irrigated by recovered and recycled water. Tensile canopies sustain a microclimate at ground level for verdant gardens of species native to the region.
Art, Memory, and the fight for a Vietnam War Memorial
by James Reston, Jr.
Having an idea is one thing. Realization of that idea is another. Maybe this should have been the main thrust of a new book on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, DC. Instead, the author of this book, whose interest in this topic dates back to his military service during the Vietnam conflict, chose to sensationalize the the cultural and political themes familiar to the project, rather than treat its progress in contrast to the evolution of other recent memorial competitions located on or near the Mall, the political and emotional components of the various memorials notwithstanding. The World War II Memorial and Eisenhower Memorial also were fraught with controversy by the public and in the press, whereby one hardly resembled the original design, and the other has not yet made it beyond the drawing board. Projects on or near the Mall run into similar obstacles in navigating their way through the DC approval process unscathed, regardless of the subject matter.\ K2K Planning Competition (Kensington / Kingsford)
Finetuning a Sydney Suburb’s Future
Competitions in Australia have become more commonplace than could have become anticipated two decades ago. It was in the early 1990s that Sydney’s mayor, Frank Sartore, decided that competitions could improve on the rather mediocre architecture so prevalent in the city at that time. As a result, major government projects became the subject of design competitions, and a number of notable projects ensued, especially in higher education.
Everyone is well aware of the measures one encounters when entering almost any tower, residential or office, in this era of high security. We are not just talking about protecting the occupants of a residential highrise, but rather the separation of workers from the street and the community at large. The Taichung Tower is intended as the antithesis to this concept of isolation, encouraging interaction at different levels, within the workplace, as well as access, though limited, to the community at large.
Taichung, certainly one of Taiwan’s most forward-looking cities, has just completed a final competition to complete the ambitious Taichung Cultural Center complex—a tower to replaced Sou Fujimoto’s abandoned winner of the initial Taichung Tower Competition (below). The Fujimoto scheme was shelved based on the high construction estimates for his revolutionary scheme—by some accounts doubling the anticipated budget. Aarhus New School of Architecture
After surmounting two formidable obstacles, an open international competition with over 260 entries and a second stage limited to four other finalists—two of which were high-profile invitees*—the young Copenhagen firm of Vargo, Nielsen & Palle was declared the winner of the Aarhus School of Architecture Competition. As is often the case when a competitor from a small firm advances to a final stage, the winner teamed up with ADEPT, which had placed in the top six as an honorable mention in the open stage and Rolvung & Brøndsted Arkitekter, Tri-consult and Steensen Varming.
|
|||
|
Copyright © 2018 Competitions All Rights Reserved COMPETITIONS, P.O. Box 20445, Louisville, Ky 40250 U.S.A Ph: (502) 451-3623; Fax: (502) 451-3623 Website: https://competitions.org E: scollyer@competitions.org IMPORTANT NOTICE : Unless otherwise indicated, photographs of buildings and projects are from professional or institutional archives. All reproduction is prohibited unless authorized by the architects, designers, office managers, consortia or archives centers concerned. The Competition Project, Inc. is not held responsible for any omissions or inaccuracies, but appreciate all comments and pertinent information that will permit necessary modifications during future updates. Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
||||
